Jody,
My sibs and I again are frustrated. We are “working owners” in one well and awaiting participation papers in another. Our Cash Call invoice dated 05/29/12 stated we each had a working interest of 0.01736% and we paid $1,228.86 each, which was cashed on 07/03/12. They failed to get our deeds straightened out until two months ago as the deeds were still in our deceased relatives’ names; therefore we had to sign division papers on this well in November 2012 to place it in our names. There were two papers; one stated unleased mineral decimal interest of 0.00002778 and the other was royalty decimal interest of 0.00007234; we have a total of 8 acres. We got a check one month ago on this well in the amount of $520.00 each; this well began production on 02/11 and has produced 68,000 barrels. Today the division order manager told us that was all we were getting; initially were told we would get one big check dating back to initial production and then monthly. I guess we were under the impression that we would receive approx. 3,000.00 each initially per calculation in back pay from this well.
Can you or anyone else tell us what the proper calculation is to determine our share in this well? I know there is a class action lawsuit going on, but we are reluctant to join as do not know if we are having royalties withheld or not. Thank you so much.
Pat Maloney
Mark Skipper said:
Welcome to the oil business. I’ve been watching what has been happening in the Bakken for a couple of years, and the one thing I have observed perfectly is by and large the mineral owners signing leases are woefully inexperienced, and they apparently don’t have access to good and seasoned advice. So many leases are vanilla 2-page forms published by the oil companies. The more acreage a mineral owners owns the worse this is for them. I’ve been in upstream E&P for 35 years, worked all over many large producing states, and I can say without a doubt the mineral owners in North Dakota and Montana are not doing themselves any favors by not having really good advice. And the problem I’ve observed for them is the operators in the Bakken are dedicated to holding as much acreage as possible without having to renew their leases, and that they are also succeeding at it very well, at least in North Dakota. This may be a one chance opportunity for many or most mineral owners, so they don’t want to get a bad lease agreement at the outset. Also, the majors and large foreign oil companies are gradually buying up the Bakken and the large operators drilling in it. That’s a negative for mineral owners and Americans, at least in my view. Large mineral owners need to get very good advice.
Mark
jody kuntz said:
Pat, I wish I would have seen this before you sent in your cash call, as that is total BS!!! You do not have to pay your share in cash up front, as it is already YOUR OIL N you were probably FORCED POOLED, WHICH IS BS ALSO!!! Under the NDIC Statutues, you are entitled to your average weighted royalty, if unleased, and the operator normally will carry you, and take your share out of the production. Now, if they properly notified you prior to commencement of drilling to lease or participate, then you would be subject to a RISK PENALTY OF 150-200%, if they PROPERLY notified you…If they did not follow procedures, you are not subject to RISK PENALTY. Wish I would have seen this in August, as they owe you, not you send them money!!! DIRT BAG LANDMEN WHO LIE FOR THE OIL COMPANIES, CAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE PARTNERS WITH THE MINERAL OWNERS, SO THEY SCARE THEM AND THEN HOLD YOUR MONEY, AND DO NOT CALL YOU BACK CAUSE THEY ARE SCREWING YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE IN THE COUNTRY!!! PLEASE PEOPLE UNITE AND PUT A STOP TO THE INSANITY OF THEM DICTATING THE SHOTS!!! JODY KUNTZ