the missing well bores from the luchini 3211 2 are they going the same way as the Argenta Fee 18 and 19 gas ?. James you are the automation dude for these cogcc crooks.
Not sure what you are referring to. I knew very little about these wells until I started reading on this blog and researching public records for my own understanding.
j
william tompkins said:
Hello James I see you knew about this before I did !! just saying. I had given up on COGCC a long time ago wouldn't you they are about as honest as you and your Dad. this has been going on for 18 years at least . Opium poppy industry in Afghanistan every one wants some of that easy money.. I'm not done James not in tell I get Mother what she got coming.
The statement of the 17 is a printout of the 17 with the 18 and 19 productions hand written on it. I would have to agree that is a nonprofessional way of presenting the statement. I thought the numbers that were written down were consistent with the public data at the state website?
william tompkins said:
James D. Lane said:what are you hoping i'll see here? they look like monthly production rates.
I'm hoping you will see that its for the Argenta Fee 17 not our well's statements .that's the wrong well to be mailing out statements for when its a response to a form 37 you were ok with that right ?
I'm not sure what the Luchini has to do with the Argenta wells. I think they were drilled and owned by different companies and I don't know what the well depth and consequent coal seams are. If they are even related.
I'm not sure why you think I am the "automation dude" for the COGCC. I'm not even sure where you came up with the term, "automation dude".
j
william tompkins said:
the missing well bores from the luchini 3211 2 are they going the same way as the Argenta Fee 18 and 19 gas ?. James you are the automation dude for these cogcc crooks.
I think I had too many Beers yesterday . I feel it today .
No worries. :)
James D. Lane said:
2830-Image58.jpg (213 KB)The statement of the 17 is a printout of the 17 with the 18 and 19 productions hand written on it. I would have to agree that is a nonprofessional way of presenting the statement. I thought the numbers that were written down were consistent with the public data at the state website?
william tompkins said:
James D. Lane said:what are you hoping i'll see here? they look like monthly production rates.
I'm hoping you will see that its for the Argenta Fee 17 not our well's statements .that's the wrong well to be mailing out statements for when its a response to a form 37 you were ok with that right ?hi james I wanted to add one of those owner relations 2012 flyer that Bp mails out . one page is dedicated to reading and understanding Bp check statements it might help a little.
