Todd, Yes you are correct. The Spot is in the South Half of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25. You just have to find the Southwest Quarter first and so on.
That is what got me confused. 35-19N-2W has two holes being drilled from 2-18N-2W, one into the Miss and one into the Woodford.
36-19N-2W is being drilled into from 6-18N-1W. Pooling for 36 was issued back in April so you only had 20 days to respond or they picked an option for you if you had acreage and they could find you.
Thank u M Barnes that’s what I was needing to know
Thank you Martha that must be the well for the pooling order in sec. 25 19n 2w, if I understood the link M. Barnes provided me describing aliquots I am the S1/2 of the SW1/4 the B.H. of the well u described in previous post Should be very near my property, am I understanding correctly ? Thanks
Thank you Martha this helps me also make sense of the spacing order I received as well for sec. 25 19N 2W.
http://jay.law.ou.edu/faculty/Hampton/Mineral%20Title%20Examination…
this is a great explanation of the Oklahoma grid. Rick Howell reposted it this morning. I couldn’t find it yesterday.
Will do thanks Ron
Martha thank you .
Thanks for the link M Barnes that is a great link on the Oklahoma grid.
Is anyone able to access the pooling orders for sec 25 19N 2W? Why computer doesn’t seem to work on the OCC website even after downloading their program thanks in advance. 
Reply Edit 15 minutes left to edit your comment.
Todd call OCC they will help you .
Ron, You can listen to video or just read the transcript and find the info on drill bits reducing Whiting’s Colorado drill time to 11 or 15 days. Still, keep in mind that not all formations are as easy to drill as others and some are much deeper than others. http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&video=3000211163
Can someone explain to me what a Blanchard Royalty is? We are getting royalty payments from Devon and it states a BR. We own the minerals. I had never seen that before. I looked it up but it is still confusing to me.
Thanks
Division order from Enterprise Products is more complex than the model form of the NODOA. One person in another county form indicated that he sent the NODOA model form in and it was refused and they demanded the more complex and seemingly problematic, from my point of view, than the model form. Gary Witt
KK Witt, all mineral owners who are having Leasing and/or Division Order problems might want to consider contacting NARO at (918)-794-1660 or a Oklahoma Corporation Commission Attorney like Michael D Stack Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73114, Telephone : (405) 286-1717
M Barnes and Rick Howell, Thank you both so much for your legal info. Here’s Oklahoma Statutes, keep in mind that there are supporting case laws that are not listed . http://www.oklegislature.gov/osStatuesTitle.html Scroll down to Title 52 Oil and Gas and click on it. It’s not as hard to read as you would think, but it is long. However, starting at §52-87.6 the statutes give definitions and answers to many of the questions I have seen on this forum. The only way to protect ourselves is to know these statutes supporting case laws, but we mineral owners might need NARO and/or Oil/Gas attorneys to help protect us from oil and gas companies and individuals who thoroughly understand these laws and use our lack of knowledge against us.
I am at the NARO convention right now. I asked the Division Order question this morning in the OK Caucus (since I received an ugly one last week as well). OK doesn’t event require a Division Order. The Model Form is all they need if any. You may send that back to clarify your royalty interest and it should say that NO TERMS of the LEASE ARE CHANGED. You do have to send in a W-9. If you need more explanation, let me know.
Also, the Blanchard Royalty is same thing as the standard 1/8. Comes from a lawsuit a long time ago. If you think you have a lease with more than 1/8, then you need to followup and get it changed.
Here is a link that may be helpful. I knew there was a court decision, but we were given the actual case name at the NARO convention.
HULL v. SUN REFINING AND MARKETING CO. 1989
http://www.leagle.com/decision/19892061789P2d1272_12047
If I was in that situation and the NADA was “refused” and based on information in the case and obtained; I would send them the NADOA division order without a SSN. Include a IRS W-9 with the SSN. Include a letter that you agree with the decimal calculation of my interest I but do not agree to other language in the DO. I am including a standard NADOA division order as a courtesy since Oklahoma Statutes do not require a signed division order per HULL v. SUN REFINING AND MARKETING CO. I respectfully request to be placed in a pay status per OK §52-570.
I am not an attorney, but with the applicable statutes and case law, I would have gone above and beyond the requirements. I would also be expecting it to be earning 12% interest while they argued about it. Not bad money today.
I own mineral rights in Logan Co. 25-19n-4w. It was leased with another co. Until Devon acquired it. It was to expire last July so Devon started pooling orders and drilling before then. Pooling is something new to me and tried to learn as much as I could. I understand the rig is down now and tanks put in place. I would like to know if there is a way to find out if there is any production. Also, I am still receiving offers to buy the rights, one of which is very sizable. Is there any way to obtain more information to know whether to sell or hold onto it? Or is it a gamble?