Okay, ignore what I said about the third party being the O&G Commission.
If a surface land owner refuses to permit a lessee or mineral rights owner access to the land to mine or drill, the lessee or owner can petition the district court in the county in which the drilling will occur. The petition is for appraisers to make recommendations of the damages that the land owner will incur. Once the petition has been filed, the lessee or owner can enter the property to begin mining or drilling for minerals. The court will decide within 30 days after the appraisal is complete on the total compensation ordered. Either party may appeal the judge’s decision by requesting a jury trial within 60 days.
Read more: What Are Surface Rights of a Land Owner in Oklahoma? | eHow.com
Lisa said:
So I took a quick peek at the statutes. It sounds like you do have some advantages, like having a contract before they can enter, and having to agree on damages. If you can’t come to an agreement, then it will be decided by a third party (O & G commission I think it was). So, a lot probably depends on the slant of that third party. Chances are, they are pro oil company. I did see the following:
§52-320.1. Restriction on location of habitable structures.
A. After the effective date of this act, it shall be unlawful to locate any habitable structure within:
-
A radius of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet from the wellbore of an active well; or
-
A radius of fifty (50) feet from the center of any surface equipment or other equipment necessary for the operation of an active well, including, but not limited to, hydrocarbon and brine storage vessels, tanks, compressors, heaters, separators, dehydrators, or any other related equipment.
B. Provided, however, the provisions of this section shall not prohibit an operator and surface owner from agreeing in writing to setback provisions with distances different from those set forth in this section.
[1] Added by Laws 2003, c. 361, § 1, eff. July 1, 2003. Renumbered from § 318.10 of this title by Laws 2006, c. 309, § 1, emerg eff. June 8, 2006.
That tells me that is what the third party would deem reasonable. So, if the proposed drill area is more than 150 feet away from your proposed building site, I think you’d lose that argument. If you look closer, maybe you’ll find something that I didn’t see.
Lisa said:
I would agree with the assessment that they can pretty much drill when and where they choose. Colorado has a surface owner bill of rights that provides a minimal amount of protection for us. Supposedly it is a big boon for us to have that, but I can tell you it’s nothing spectacular. Even if you have something similar, I don’t think you can choose where the wells goes, however you can require that it be in a reasonable location. The other problem is that you are buying the property knowing that they want to put the wells in a certain place. If your house was there first, and then they started scoping around wanting to put the oil wells in that location, that would be a different story. You already have wells all over your property. How much say did you have in the location of those? Go to the Oklahoma Statutes, and see what you find under the chapter natural resources.