Linda:
That’s your call but if you feel that you don’t fully understand what you are signing, it might be wise to seek advice from a professional source. I would first negotiate my own lease terms and you might decide that additional help is not needed. If you do need to seek help, you might find an oil and gas attorney in your area who could look over the lease and provide advice.
Linda Downey said:
Should I seek legal advice and do you have any recommendations? I am in Tennessee and it is not possible to travel to Montana.
charles s mallory said:
Linda:
I would require payment be a check and not a bank draft. You might want to go to the search engine (white box at top) and google in “cold draft” to view posts dealing with this topic. Your lease will specify the details of your agreement including the % royalty, etc. You might want to negotiate the lease whereas you will not be responsible for the transportation costs. Also, you might want to add a “pugh clause”. You can also google this for an explanation. Again, how many net mineral acres are we talking about? Do some homework before signing anything.
Linda Downey said:
I have read some confusing information regarding the bonus…should I ask for the money up front and in check form, not a bank draft? One post suggested to not lease as you may not get the royalties promised. Does it depend on how the contract is written? What do you think? Is the only negative with not participating and being forced pooled the risk penalty?
charles s mallory said:
Linda:
The GIS map indicates that Continental Resources has already spudded the Joseph 1-22H on your mineral area. If this is the case, you want to be very firm in your negotiations in regards to bonus, etc. Again, I still believe your best choice would be to lease but you do understand that you don’t have to lease with Continental as you could shop around for the best deal.
charles s mallory said:
Linda:
You can pull up the Montana Map as follows: Google “Montana Oil and Gas”; Click on “On - Line Data”; Click on “Live Data Access”; Click on GIS at top; a map of Montana will appear; use your cursor to click on the area where your minerals are located (hint: you may have to try several times before you find your exact Township/Range/Section area; click several times to magnify; once you locate your area, click on the “i” in circle at top; now click on the individual dots (which are wells) and identify the well operator, etc. Hope this helps.
Linda Downey said:
Thanks Charles for the information and here is the exact location: Township 23 North, Range 54 East of the M.P.M. (what does M.P.M. mean?) Section 22: N 1/2. Also how can I see where the drilling is taking place?
Thanks again Charles!
charles s mallory said:
Linda:
You didn’t specify the exact location of these minerals (Township/Range/Section) or the total net mineral acres involved but if plans are in the works to drill soon, I would think that you would be in line to get a very good lease. Of the four choices you stated, I would lean towards leasing your minerals as the other involves factors that you may not fully understand. You can read posts on this forum dealing with participating in a well but familiarize yourself fully before engaging in this type action. I would counter this $500/acre with $1000/acre and see what they say. The 20% is norm and the 3 year agreement is good. Again, it also depends where your minerals are located in Richland County and more important, the wells within the proximity of your area. If you have some good producers close to your area, your negotiating power is much greater but if your area is somewhat undrilled (risky) then the opposite applies. Good luck in your negotiations.