# Well released from confidential status

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565
**Category:** Divide County, ND
**Created:** [August 18, 2014, 6:48am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565 "2014-08-18T06:48:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dr\_Dew](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Dr\_Dew](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Dr_Dew)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2014, 6:48am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/1 "2014-08-18T06:48:04Z")

</div>

#27057 - HUNT OIL COMPANY, SIOUX TRAIL 160-101-36-25H-1 was released from confidential status on 07-30-14. IP shows 268 bopd.

I would appreciate it if someone could provide more detailed production numbers for this well. Also, if anyone might know how many frac stages this well has, or where I might find that information.

Thanks for any information you can provide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lars\_Ljungmann\_Spatzek](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Lars\_Ljungmann\_Spatzek](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Lars_Ljungmann_Spatzek)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2014, 12:14pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/2 "2014-08-18T12:14:03Z")

</div>

Dew: 25 stages and sand frac. Lots of water and not that much gas. NDIC File No: 27057 API No: 33-023-01132-00-00 CTB No: 127057 Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 4/1/2014 Wellbore type: Horizontal Location: SWSE 36-160-101 Footages: 265 FSL 1980 FEL Latitude: 48.634245 Longitude: -103.675194 Current Operator: HUNT OIL COMPANY Current Well Name: SIOUX TRAIL 160-101-36-25H-1 Elevation(s): 2159 KB 2134 GR 2135 GL Total Depth: 19068 Field: SIOUX TRAIL Spud Date(s): 1/30/2014 Casing String(s): 9.625" 1746’ 7" 9599’ Completion Data Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 9748-18968 Comp: 4/1/2014 Status: F Date: 4/12/2014 Spacing: 2SEC Cumulative Production Data Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 9205 Cum MCF Gas: 5828 Cum Water: 42481 Production Test Data IP Test Date: 4/12/2014 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 268 IP MCF: 230 IP Water: 1192

Monthly Production Data Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare BAKKEN | 6-2014 | 29 | 2927 | 2650 | 12481 | 1709 | 0 | 1171 BAKKEN | 5-2014 | 30 | 3540 | 3909 | 13020 | 2367 | 0 | 1810 BAKKEN | 4-2014 | 18 | 2725 | 1963 | 15729 | 1752 | 0 | 1520 BAKKEN | 3-2014 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 1251 | 0 | 0 | 0

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dr\_Dew](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Dr\_Dew](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Dr_Dew)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2014, 2:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/3 "2014-08-19T02:16:29Z")

</div>

Thanks Lars,

I’m one of the mineral owners of this well, this was exactly the information that I was looking for. I’ve noticed a lot of wells in this area of Divide County seem to produce a lot more water than oil.

Is a lot of this water that was used for fracking the well that is being brought back up? And if so, would it be reasonable to assume that in the ensuing months, that the BBLS of water each month should decrease, and the BBLS of oil hopefully may increase a little?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elizabeth2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/e79b87/32.png) [@Elizabeth2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Elizabeth2)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2014, 2:35am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/4 "2014-08-19T02:35:26Z")

</div>

Hi,

My family and I have mineral rights in Divide County also. 160, 100, SE part of Section 10 and SW part of Section 11. There is drilling started in the section north of Section 10 and we are part of the pool. We just signed a Division Order a few weeks ago.

Lars, where did you find the monthly production data?

Interesting!

Elizabeth

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lars\_Ljungmann\_Spatzek](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Lars\_Ljungmann\_Spatzek](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Lars_Ljungmann_Spatzek)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2014, 7:20am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/5 "2014-08-19T07:20:03Z")

</div>

Elizabeth and Dew,

In the Basic Services under [www.nd.gov/oilgas](http://www.nd.gov/oilgas)

You can download the well files. 50 dollars for 12 months. 27057 is a middle Bakken well. A future TFH well may do better. And 35-40 frac stages. The water/oil and the amount of gas - a lot of water I must say.

Good luck in the future!

For comparison - our family’s first well in Long Creek - Williams:

| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF prod | MCF sold | Vent/flare |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BAKKEN | 1-2013 | 31 | 19439 | 20094 | 8013 | 29596 | 15078 | 14518 |
| BAKKEN | 12-2012 | 31 | 14300 | 13548 | 6533 | 18656 | 7861 | 10795 |
| BAKKEN | 11-2012 | 30 | 13471 | 13463 | 6198 | 14874 | 5343 | 9531 |
| BAKKEN | 10-2012 | 31 | 16017 | 16139 | 7662 | 17715 | 406 | 17309 |
| BAKKEN | 9-2012 | 30 | 22106 | 22113 | 10812 | 29938 | 2058 | 27880 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 12 | 15835 | 14642 | 22295 | 16927 | 0 | 16927 |

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/3ec8ea/32.png) [@r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/r_w_kennedy)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2014, 5:51pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/6 "2014-08-19T17:51:51Z")

</div>

I would like to add that in an absolute sense, 8,000 barrels of water is a lot of water but I also have seen wells that produce 4 times as much water as oil and they are still profitable. The well above is good to better than good in my view, from the mineral owner perspective.

If you are leased the cost of the disposal of the water does not come out of your royalty check.

I have also seen wells that have produced 10 times as much water as oil and the well produced 1 million barrels of water over 20 years time but there was a salt water disposal well on the lease. This is just to put things into perspective for new mineral royalty owners.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elizabeth2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/e79b87/32.png) [@Elizabeth2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Elizabeth2)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2014, 1:30am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/7 "2014-08-20T01:30:20Z")

</div>

Found it. Thanks Lars!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 12:23am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-released-from-confidential-status/9565/8 "2018-08-15T00:23:47Z")

</div>


