# Well Lat/Longs accurate in Oklahoma?

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182
**Category:** Oil and Gas Leasing Help
**Created:** [October 15, 2018, 5:33pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182 "2018-10-15T17:33:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/edkrane)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 5:33pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/1 "2018-10-15T17:33:05Z")

</div>

Scenario: 2 different leases, all wells are producing. Lease A has 3 wells. Upon retrieving the Lat/Long for each well in the OCC well lookup, each well can be easily located on Google Earth; Lease B has 4 wells. Upon retrieving the Lat/Longs for each well from the OCC website, only 1 well appears remotely operational, the rest cannot be located. No wells close to the listed Lat/Longs. Each lease is 25+ years old. Is there a possible explanation for this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 5:40pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/2 "2018-10-15T17:40:57Z")

</div>

According to the OCC website, have the wells you are looking for been plugged?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/edkrane)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 5:45pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/3 "2018-10-15T17:45:46Z")

</div>

They are listed as “AC”… to my understanding not plugged, and have had some production as recently as 8-2018.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 5:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/4 "2018-10-15T17:54:46Z")

</div>

Only can think that Lat/Long aren’t correct on the old filings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@edkrane](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/edkrane)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 5:58pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/5 "2018-10-15T17:58:04Z")

</div>

Both leases exist from the same approximate time period of the early 80’s. Interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 7:27pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/well-lat-longs-accurate-in-oklahoma/35182/6 "2025-01-11T19:27:18Z")

</div>


