# Texas Division

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/texas-division/70864
**Category:** Texas Mineral Rights
**Created:** [May 12, 2023, 2:09pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/texas-division/70864 "2023-05-12T14:09:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![El-Patron](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/48db29/32.png) [@El-Patron](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/El-Patron)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2023, 2:09pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/texas-division/70864/1 "2023-05-12T14:09:14Z")

</div>

On division orders in Texas, is the % of your horizontal figured at FPT first point taken? Or is it figured on the acreage divisions of the different leases? This scenario is on-site pads that are a little bit out into the field due to existing pipeline easement. (Don’t penalize me for providing “the curve” lol, except it’s not funny.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [May 15, 2023, 3:22pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/texas-division/70864/2 "2023-05-15T15:22:55Z")

</div>

In Texas, it all depends upon what type of well it is. Allocation wells or a different type. Probably needs an attorney to give the exact definition. What is happening subsurface is important. I doubt that the pad enters into the calculations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 10, 2023, 2:09pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/texas-division/70864/3 "2023-08-10T14:09:31Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.