# Stephens/Garvin sec 6,7 2n.4w /31 3n 4w 202101927-32

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652
**Category:** Stephens County, OK
**Created:** [March 29, 2022, 3:38pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652 "2022-03-29T15:38:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jennifer5](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/f19dbf/32.png) [@Jennifer5](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Jennifer5)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2022, 3:38pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652/1 "2022-03-29T15:38:05Z")

</div>

The orders were issued but I have not yet seen the permit. Anyone have any insight?

202101927-32 Garvin Section 31 Township 3N Range 4W & Stephens Section 6 & 7, Township 2N Range 4W

Also 202101413-16. Stephens Section 8, 17, 20 - Township 2N Range 4W.

Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2022, 4:07pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652/2 "2022-03-29T16:07:53Z")

</div>

202101927-32 Garvin sec 31 3n 4w & Stephens sec 6 & 7, - 2n 4w

I do not see the Sympson 15-31-6-7XHS listed yet on the OCC well records site.

202101413-16. Stephens Sec 8,17, 20- 2n 4w,

I do not see the Poteet 11-17-20XHS listed yet on the OCC well records site.

Time will tell…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zzee](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/b2d939/32.png) [@Zzee](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Zzee)
#### Post date: [May 27, 2022, 12:42am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652/3 "2022-05-27T00:42:56Z")

</div>

I received a notice this week that Continental was petitioning to have the order amended so that it is for Woodford only, not to include Hunton and Mississippian.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [May 27, 2022, 3:35pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652/4 "2022-05-27T15:35:14Z")

</div>

Some slight progress then…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2022, 3:38pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/stephens-garvin-sec-6-7-2n-4w-31-3n-4w-202101927-32/65652/5 "2022-06-27T15:38:16Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.