# Special Clause within a Division Order **URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/special-clause-within-a-division-order/84802 **Category:** Division Orders **Created:** [November 23, 2025, 1:11pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/special-clause-within-a-division-order/84802 "2025-11-23T13:11:21Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 7
### Author: ![AJ11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/838e76/32.png) [@AJ11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/AJ11) #### Post date: [January 22, 2026, 3:31pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/special-clause-within-a-division-order/84802/7 "2026-01-22T15:31:09Z")
Look at the division order in Texas Natural Resources Code in this thread on Mineral Rights Forum: > [@Verbage & Clauses](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/verbage-clauses/77341): > > Recently received a DO in the mail that I was unsure about due to the length of each clause. I happened to stumble upon the Texas Natural Resource Code and found [part 91.402](https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/NR/htm/NR.91.htm). This is literally verbatim what is on the Division Order. So my question, Is the Texas Natural Resource Code of Oil & Gas a good trusted resource to use? Do the Texas codes & provisions favor one party more than the other (Operator vs. Owner). Meaning do they help protect the owner. I’ve been relying more on the NADOA … --- _[View the full topic](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/special-clause-within-a-division-order/84802)._