# Seperate parcels, different counties, same lease?

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961
**Category:** General Mineral Rights Discussion
**Created:** [January 31, 2011, 1:02am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961 "2011-01-31T01:02:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Iggy\_Thorogood](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Iggy\_Thorogood](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Iggy_Thorogood)
#### Post date: [January 31, 2011, 1:02am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961/1 "2011-01-31T01:02:01Z")

</div>

Can a lease cover seperate parcels, although adjacent, in different counties?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Buddy\_Cotten](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/buddy_cotten/32/5079_2.png) [@Buddy\_Cotten](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Buddy_Cotten)
#### Post date: [January 31, 2011, 3:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961/2 "2011-01-31T03:40:04Z")

</div>

Yes. Even different states. The lease will need to be recorded in each county to impart constructive notice to innocent purchasers (there are a few exceptions to this, such as would occur in Texas under this same situation).

As an aside, there is no advantage in having non-contiguous tracts of land on the same lease and there are many disadvantages. My suggestion is to pretty much always have non-contiguous tracts on separate leases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Roger\_D\_Spears](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/9dc877/32.png) [@Roger\_D\_Spears](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Roger_D_Spears)
#### Post date: [January 31, 2011, 4:28pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961/3 "2011-01-31T16:28:53Z")

</div>

Buddy;

I have a interest in 45 acres that is in two different quarter sections. I have heard that it would be in my best interest to lease each seperate quarter section. Doing this supposedly would make it unnecessary for a pooling clause. Would one lease suffice for both quarter sections?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 4:33am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/seperate-parcels-different-counties-same-lease/23961/4 "2018-08-15T04:33:35Z")

</div>