# Saving Horizontal well for future production S35-18N-05W

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608
**Category:** Kingfisher County, OK
**Created:** [November 6, 2017, 6:56am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608 "2017-11-06T06:56:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Archie\_Smith](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/71e660/32.png) [@Archie\_Smith](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Archie_Smith)
#### Post date: [November 6, 2017, 6:56am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608/1 "2017-11-06T06:56:04Z")

</div>

This horizontal well, Engle 18-05-35-1H, was dug but to date no form 1002a has been submitted. Following a great suggestion from a fellow member of this group I did find on the FracFocus website that this Chisholm well was visited on 7/27 to 7/29 without apparently anything being injected. No water was reported injected. The fracturing fluid composition is reported as diatomaceous earth, calcined 50%; water 30%; plus salt and phosphonic acid. Can anyone give an opinion? Is the well just not worthy of a good frac or is this a method of putting a well on the shelf for future completion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Justin\_A](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/8c91f0/32.png) [@Justin\_A](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Justin_A)
#### Post date: [November 7, 2017, 11:32pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608/2 "2017-11-07T23:32:58Z")

</div>

I checked the frac focus report, and it looks like they either had a mechanical issue or this was some other operation besides a frac. They probably haven’t completed it yet, but be sure they will soon. Chisolm is moving fast and will get it done soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Archie\_Smith](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/71e660/32.png) [@Archie\_Smith](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Archie_Smith)
#### Post date: [November 10, 2017, 8:30am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608/3 "2017-11-10T08:30:44Z")

</div>

Apparently subsequent treatment allowed the well to go into production. The 1002a report finally showed up on the OCC web site. The well was completed 8/5; 1st production 8/19 and first sale 8/29. It came in flowing at 300+ bbl/day. The well appeared to be in production when I visited the site in late September but there was no available information that I was privy to that confirmed the production. The hacked OCC web site no doubt contributed to the delay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 10:12pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/saving-horizontal-well-for-future-production-s35-18n-05w/1608/4 "2018-08-14T22:12:05Z")

</div>


