# S 30 and 31 8N-4W
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511
**Category:** McClain County, OK
**Created:** [March 24, 2018, 8:26pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511 "2018-03-24T20:26:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Alice\_Sue\_Wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Alice_Sue_Wilson)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2018, 8:26pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/1 "2018-03-24T20:26:22Z")
Has anyone had any interest on either or both of these locations? Have had some interest. Looked at McClain County filings and seems like activity is starting.
Susie
---
### Author:  [@Tom\_Ed\_Moore](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Tom_Ed_Moore)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2018, 11:57am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/2 "2018-03-25T11:57:57Z")
Sue,
I have about one acre in 30. Hell, they’re drilling all over McClain and Grady County.
---
### Author:  [@Alice\_Sue\_Wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Alice_Sue_Wilson)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2018, 12:00pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/3 "2018-03-25T12:00:30Z")
You got that right. Just wondering who the main players are. Several calling me.
---
### Author:  [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2018, 4:00pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/4 "2018-03-27T16:00:31Z")
Newfield is the main operator in the area near 30 & 31. You may get calls from several other companies that want a piece of the action.
---
### Author:  [@ursula](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/ursula)
#### Post date: [December 18, 2019, 5:22pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/5 "2019-12-18T17:22:10Z")
EOG has my lease in 31 8N-4W. Are they working in the section?
---
### Author:  [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2019, 6:39pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/6 "2019-12-19T18:39:14Z")
EOG has quite a few pending OCC cases for sections 30 and 31. Hearings supposed to have been on Dec 16. I have not checked to see the status. You should have all those mailings if you are a mineral owner of record.
---
### Author:  [@Rick\_Buscemi](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Rick_Buscemi)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2020, 9:55pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/7 "2020-01-02T21:55:18Z")
Question… today, I received the outcome (I believe) of the pending cases for Section 30, Township 8 North, Range 4 West. Horizontal spacing, increased density, and 2 cases for multiunit horizontal wells. All stated… “order dismissing cause.” Dismissed at docket call by Applicant as provided by Rule 165: 5-9-2(e) of the Rules of Practice of the OCC. I understand that it appears that all the cases have been dismissed by OCC, but what does the rule which was stated mean? Also, any other thoughts on why these cases were dismissed would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
---
### Author:  [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2020, 10:02pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/8 "2020-01-02T22:02:14Z")
The OCC has certain rules that they have to abide by for making determinations. They are stated by Chapter and Subchapter and then parts. Here is one citation for them. [http://okrules.elaws.us/oac/title165\_chapter5](http://okrules.elaws.us/oac/title165_chapter5)
I think they wanted the order entered and made effective prior to the issuance of the order-essentially back dating it. They have resubmitted the cases under new numbers. 201905589-5593 for section 30 and 31.
---
### Author:  [@Kenny\_DuBose](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Kenny_DuBose)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2020, 10:07pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/s-30-and-31-8n-4w/25511/9 "2020-01-02T22:07:38Z")