# Robinson 7n6w section 3
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501
**Category:** Grady County, OK
**Created:** [June 21, 2019, 7:48pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501 "2019-06-21T19:48:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Paula2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Paula2)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2019, 7:48pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/1 "2019-06-21T19:48:10Z")
Anyone received division orders for Robinson 3-15-10-3XHS and 4-15-10-3XHS? Have minerals in Township 7 North, Range 6 West, Section 3.
---
### Author:  [@Pat\_L](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Pat_L)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2019, 9:45pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/2 "2019-06-21T21:45:46Z")
Paula, I am not experienced in reading OCC reports, but it looks like to me that they had to stop drilling before they got into Section 3. I don’t have a clue as to why. Maybe someone on here with more expertise can share some additional info.
---
### Author:  [@Paula2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Paula2)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2019, 10:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/3 "2019-06-21T22:05:29Z")
Thanks, just haven’t received anything confirming that but probably will.
---
### Author:  [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2019, 10:31pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/4 "2019-06-21T22:31:20Z")
You can look up the survey data at the OCC well records site. The surface location is in 22-7N-6W. Use 2207N06W in the location box. Looks like the wells came up short.
---
### Author:  [@Paula2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Paula2)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2019, 11:41pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/5 "2019-06-21T23:41:56Z")
Think Section 15 was start.
---
### Author:  [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2019, 12:02am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/6 "2019-06-22T00:02:30Z")
Paula: The #3 & #4 wells were not drilled. The #5 well was plugged and replaced by the #5R (R=replacement). It did not penetrate Section 3. The surface location is in Section 22, but the wellbore did not penetrate the Springer formation until the wellbore entered Section 15. The bottom of the wellbore is in Section 10.
Respectfully, Todd M. Baker
---
### Author:  [@jake\_allen](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/jake_allen)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2019, 12:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/7 "2019-06-22T00:40:20Z")
OCC site is showing Robinson 3 and 4 wells as being completed in the Springer. The No. 3 with a 9,832’ lateral with first production Nov 4 and the No. 4 has a 7,900’ lateral with first production Oct 26, 2018. With both wells being drilled off the same surface pad in Section 22, while both were drilled neither made it into Section 3 with the reported lateral lengths.
---
### Author:  [@Paula2](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Paula2)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2019, 12:43am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/8 "2019-06-22T00:43:21Z")
What I figured: Section 3, Township 7 North, Range 6 West not touched.
---
### Author:  [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2019, 2:49am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/9 "2019-06-22T02:49:05Z")
Good catch Jake. I should have looked twice. The #3 had 26,487 BO & 37,134 mmcf in November sales. The #4 had 23,798 BO & 32,928 mmcf in November sales.
---
### Author:  [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:11pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/robinson-7n6w-section-3/47501/10 "2025-01-11T18:11:28Z")