# Risk Penalty?
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202
**Category:** Pittsburg County, OK
**Created:** [October 5, 2022, 6:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202 "2022-10-05T18:54:24Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Haramoni](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Haramoni)
#### Post date: [October 5, 2022, 6:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202/1 "2022-10-05T18:54:24Z")
Does Oklahoma use a risk penalty approach to non-consenting mineral rights owners in forced pooling? Thank you.
---
### Author:  [@tim\_dowd](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/tim_dowd)
#### Post date: [October 5, 2022, 8:40pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202/2 "2022-10-05T20:40:01Z")
No; the mineral owner or nonconsenting lessee is typically given an option to a) participate, b) lose/transfer their interest for a lower bonus, but higher royalty, or c) a higher bonus and lesser royalty. It does not have a risk-penalty approach like New Mexico or North Dakota.
---
### Author:  [@Diesel](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Diesel)
#### Post date: [October 5, 2022, 10:21pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202/3 "2022-10-05T22:21:05Z")
There’s also a risk penalty in Texas when MIPA is involved.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [January 3, 2023, 6:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/risk-penalty/68202/4 "2023-01-03T18:54:26Z")
This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.