# Revised spacing order Caddo 30-10-11 **URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/revised-spacing-order-caddo-30-10-11/48126 **Category:** Caddo County, OK **Created:** [July 7, 2019, 4:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/revised-spacing-order-caddo-30-10-11/48126 "2019-07-07T16:08:29Z") **Posts on this page:** 3 **Page:** 1
### Author: ![Steve\_Hunt](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/steve_hunt/32/3909_2.png) [@Steve\_Hunt](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Steve_Hunt) #### Post date: [July 7, 2019, 4:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/revised-spacing-order-caddo-30-10-11/48126/1 "2019-07-07T16:08:29Z")
We received notice of hearing to vacate old spacing orders and to establish 640-acre horizontal drilling and spacing unit for Hoxbar oil. In our current lease on these acres, we specified 640-acre spacing for gas and 160-acre spacing for oil. The fact that the operators are working on spacing is good news but I wonder if there is any reason to contest the proposed spacing. Any advice is welcome. The Cause CD #: 201903524. ---
### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes) #### Post date: [July 7, 2019, 8:27pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/revised-spacing-order-caddo-30-10-11/48126/2 "2019-07-07T20:27:25Z")
No reason to protest in my opinion. The 640 horizontal spacing is standard. That way you get royalties off of every horizontal drilled and perforated in the section. ---
### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV) #### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:18pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/revised-spacing-order-caddo-30-10-11/48126/3 "2025-01-11T18:18:44Z")