# Question

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/question/25789
**Category:** Garvin County, OK
**Created:** [February 17, 2018, 9:48pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/question/25789 "2018-02-17T21:48:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Teresa\_Mercer](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/90ced4/32.png) [@Teresa\_Mercer](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Teresa_Mercer)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2018, 9:48pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/question/25789/1 "2018-02-17T21:48:14Z")

</div>

What is the reason Newfield Exploration Continent Inc. asked for a motion to reopen for Section 25 & 36, Township 2 North, Range 3 West in Garvin County? It was granted; I just want to know why they would reopen this pooling.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:13pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/question/25789/2 "2025-01-11T18:13:27Z")

</div>