# Pummill ruling

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/pummill-ruling/26093
**Category:** Grady County, OK
**Created:** [January 9, 2018, 5:53am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/pummill-ruling/26093 "2018-01-09T05:53:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Betsy\_McBride](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ad7895/32.png) [@Betsy\_McBride](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Betsy_McBride)
#### Post date: [January 9, 2018, 5:53am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/pummill-ruling/26093/1 "2018-01-09T05:53:47Z")

</div>

I was told today that a new ruling on the Pummill case strengthens rights of mineral owners. Can anyone refer me/us to news?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:12pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/pummill-ruling/26093/2 "2025-01-11T18:12:19Z")

</div>