# MultiUnit Horizontal Allocations % May Be Off

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/multiunit-horizontal-allocations-may-be-off/90042
**Category:** Custer County, OK
**Created:** [November 15, 2026, 5:00am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/multiunit-horizontal-allocations-may-be-off/90042 "2026-11-15T05:00:32Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ole\_Jim\_Bob](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/o/71e660/32.png) [@Ole\_Jim\_Bob](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ole_Jim_Bob)
#### Post date: [November 15, 2026, 5:00am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/multiunit-horizontal-allocations-may-be-off/90042/1 "2026-11-15T05:00:33Z")

</div>

CD2026-001339

Could someone else take a look at the proposed allocation percentages on Exhibit 2, The bottom hole survey found in the ECF?

While reviewing Exhibit 2, I noticed a discrepancy between the upper summary table and the lower unit allocation table regarding the endpoint used for the completed interval. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.