# MT 24N 58E section 15

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168
**Category:** Richland County, MT
**Created:** [September 22, 2014, 2:20pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168 "2014-09-22T14:20:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jim\_roth](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/13edae/32.png) [@jim\_roth](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/jim_roth)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2014, 2:20pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/1 "2014-09-22T14:20:11Z")

</div>

We recently received an offer of $750. 1/18 3yr lease from Kraken, is this a good deal?

Thanks, Jim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Robert\_Carleton](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/robert_carleton/32/2494_2.png) [@Robert\_Carleton](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Robert_Carleton)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2014, 4:36pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/2 "2014-09-22T16:36:48Z")

</div>

Jim:

Do you mean 1/8, instead of 1/18?

Our latest lease (in Mississippi) they have gone from 1/8 (12.5%) to 3/16 (18.75%).

About 4 years ago we only got $200 an acre for a three-year lease with XTO for Richland Township 22N, Range 60E, Section 5, SW 1/4 (160 Acres). I believe that that was a 1/8th lease. We are currently looking for a company that is interested in our property.

So based upon my numbers, if your number is 1/8 and not 1/18, then I would think it sounds like a fair offer in my opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Robert\_Carleton](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/robert_carleton/32/2494_2.png) [@Robert\_Carleton](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Robert_Carleton)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2014, 4:48pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/3 "2014-09-22T16:48:06Z")

</div>

Jim, also see Mark Presley’s posts from a few months ago. Some of the replies indicated that in some areas the offers are even higher.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jim\_roth](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/13edae/32.png) [@jim\_roth](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/jim_roth)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2014, 6:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/4 "2014-09-22T18:08:09Z")

</div>

Whoops! I meant 18%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mark\_Presley](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/mark_presley/32/4583_2.png) [@Mark\_Presley](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Mark_Presley)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2014, 6:33pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/5 "2014-09-22T18:33:18Z")

</div>

Bob is correct, we were given $1800/acre and 20% on a 3 year lease in Section 11 & 12 of Township 24N Range 58E 3 months ago.

Based on my tracking, in addition to recent drilling permits pulled by Whiting, and Emerald, I believe development is just around the corner here. Unless you really need the lease $, I would be tempted to wait to see if your interests are drilled on, thus getting you force pooled into the spacing unit, and getting 100% of the royalties instead of only 20%!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 12:17am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/mt-24n-58e-section-15/9168/6 "2018-08-15T00:17:17Z")

</div>


