# Logan County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427
**Category:** Logan County, OK
**Created:** [June 19, 2011, 3:10am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427 "2011-06-19T03:10:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 175

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2014, 6:35am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5340 "2014-06-28T06:35:00Z")

</div>

**Logan:** Devon Energy Production Co., LP; Alline 15-19N-2W No. 1WH Well; NE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 15-19N-02W; 257 barrels oil per day, 715,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,146.

Devon Energy Production Co., LP; Alline 22-19N-2W No. 1WH Well; NE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 15-19N-02W; 45 barrels oil per day, 257,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,382.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2014, 8:11am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5341 "2014-07-01T08:11:00Z")

</div>

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD22D5D.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD22D5D.pdf)

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CACF.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CACF.pdf)

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CAD9.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CAD9.pdf)

Here are some wells around 15 & 16

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Rick\_Ropp](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/aeb1de/32.png) [@Rick\_Ropp](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Rick_Ropp)
#### Post date: [June 30, 2014, 9:37pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5342 "2014-06-30T21:37:00Z")

</div>

Does anyone have any updates on Section 15-19 North 4 West or Section 16-19 North 4 West?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2014, 8:02am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5343 "2014-07-01T08:02:00Z")

</div>

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1A2D2.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1A2D2.pdf)

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1AE12.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1AE12.pdf)

This is all I could find on 15 & 16- 19n-4w

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2014, 7:46am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5344 "2014-07-01T07:46:00Z")

</div>

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/imaging/OGWellRecords.aspx](http://imaging.occeweb.com/imaging/OGWellRecords.aspx)

Rick, you can monitor the process with the above. Type in with leading zeros if needed. Fuxa 2-15H should be almost done. It spud (1002A) on Dec. 15, 2013. You won’t hear anything until about six months after completion when you will get a Division Order, then check for ~6 months of production.

Fuxa 1-16H has not spud yet (or has not been reported yet).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2014, 6:31am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5345 "2014-07-03T06:31:00Z")

</div>

**Logan:** Devon Energy Production Co. LP; Diedrich 11-19N-4W No. 1WH Well; NW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 11-19N-04W; 74 barrels oil per day, 211,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,746.

Devon Energy Production Co. LP; Diedrich 13-19N-4W No. 1WH Well; NW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 11-19N-04W; 255 barrels oil per day, 528,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 11,804.

Devon Energy Production Co. LP; Diedrich 14-19N-4W No. 1WH Well; NW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 11-19N-04W; 385 barrels oil per day, 675,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 11,365.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 4, 2014, 10:46am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5346 "2014-07-04T10:46:00Z")

</div>

Thanks Ron, Guess we need more salt water pipelines. Sand Ridge has salt water disposal pipelines. Do you know where they terminate?

“By the end of this year (2013), the company would have invested around $650 million in the salt-water disposal infrastructure. SandRidge disposes around 865,000 barrels of water through 850 miles of pipeline on a daily basis.”

[http://seekingalpha.com/article/1744492-why-sandridge-is-one-solid-oil-stock-to-buy](http://seekingalpha.com/article/1744492-why-sandridge-is-one-solid-oil-stock-to-buy)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 4, 2014, 7:55am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5347 "2014-07-04T07:55:00Z")

</div>

> **[The Oklahoman: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, News, Politics and Sports](https://www.oklahoman.com/)**
>
> The Oklahoman is the number one source for Oklahoma City breaking news, politics, business, sports, entertainment and obituaries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Karen\_Williams](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/d07c76/32.png) [@Karen\_Williams](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Karen_Williams)
#### Post date: [July 9, 2014, 1:34am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5348 "2014-07-09T01:34:00Z")

</div>

Thank you in advance for any help anyone can provide. I received a letter from Devon stating the completion of well BJ 17-18N-3W 2MH and the interest is the same as the Hopfer 1-17MH so no new DO issued. Can anyone tell me if this is the Increased Density Well the OCC sent notice on months ago? Also, on June’s check detail under “Owner Net Detail” it says the new well is in 20/18N/3W not 17-18N-3W. I truly am grateful to anyone who can help me understand this or point me in the right direction to find the information. I tried the OCC website but got more confused…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 9, 2014, 6:49am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5349 "2014-07-09T06:49:00Z")

</div>

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CADA.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1CADA.pdf)

[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD10AA8.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD10AA8.pdf)

Karen both wells are from a surface location in Section 20. You should have same interest in both wells.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 9, 2014, 7:20am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5350 "2014-07-09T07:20:00Z")

</div>

**Logan:** Devon Energy Production Co. LP; Tapadera 3-18N-2W No. 1WH Well; SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 03-18N-02W; 250 barrels oil per day, 358,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,638.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Karen\_Williams](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/d07c76/32.png) [@Karen\_Williams](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Karen_Williams)
#### Post date: [July 9, 2014, 10:59am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5351 "2014-07-09T10:59:00Z")

</div>

Thank you Ron for your quick response! We also have 3 other pieces of land in Logan totaling maybe 10 acres. We have been receiving many letters offering to purchase minerals but are not interested in selling. How can I find out what is going on with these in order to receive this much attention? They are: 17 18N 4W, 25 18N 4W, 2 17N 4W. I appreciate your time and knowledge!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 10, 2014, 1:40pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5352 "2014-07-10T13:40:00Z")

</div>

Sandra, it seems like geology in Oklahoma is similar to the Eagle Ford in that it can change significantly from one mile to the next and EOG is using a new 1 mile lateral completion design in the Eagle Ford that they claim is extremely better than 2 mile laterals sometimes by 200% to 300% more. Their new completion design focuses on the well bore and more surface area can be stimulated increasing the total area fractured freeing up more resource and that the technique opens up more surface area of the source rock and it keeps it open. EOG is using their new technique in Bakken and Penn Virginia and report superior results.

[http://seekingalpha.com/article/1465261-bakken-update-the-top-eagle-ford-wells-of-all-time-are-moving-to-the-bakken](http://seekingalpha.com/article/1465261-bakken-update-the-top-eagle-ford-wells-of-all-time-are-moving-to-the-bakken)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [July 10, 2014, 11:50am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5353 "2014-07-10T11:50:00Z")

</div>

I do not think you can prevent it. The Oklahoma Corporation Commission decides. You can only make a contract that involves your mineral rights in your particular description. You have no say-so over the rest of the section or the section next door. (Unless you control both sections at \>51%-not sure about that) The OCC is trying to make decisions that recover the most hydrocarbons at the most efficient costs. You would have to have a really good geologic reason, like a major fault, but that would really involve a geologist, engineer, the oil company, etc. If you are worried about the 1280 acres, in OK, your royalty is based upon your net mineral acres in each 640 section for horizontals. So it you have 10 acres, then your percentage is 10/640 x Royalty rate X % perfs in the well in your section. In ND, it is another story and your percentage is diluted by the larger spacing units. Wouldn’t you rather have something instead of nothing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 11, 2014, 10:29am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5354 "2014-07-11T10:29:00Z")

</div>

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reporting that Oklahoma ranks fifth in U.S. oil production (not including Federal off-shore production) with April 2014 production up 83% over April 2010. See chart at bottom of page:

[http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPOK1&f=M](http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPOK1&f=M)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 11, 2014, 9:45am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5355 "2014-07-11T09:45:00Z")

</div>

The International Energy Agency (IEA) June 2014 reporting that the U.S. is the biggest producer of oil and natural gas liquids (liquids separated from natural gas) surpassing all other countries this year (2014) with daily output exceeding 11 million barrels in the first quarter.

[http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2014/june/iea-releases-oil-market-report-for-june.html](http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2014/june/iea-releases-oil-market-report-for-june.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 13, 2014, 2:28pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5356 "2014-07-13T14:28:00Z")

</div>

View your well site pads for Mini LNG Plants and Onsite Trailer Vessel(s) that act as storage for LNG. The post-production onsite LNG process is very costly, so check to make sure these costs are not deducted from your royalty interest production payments. Mini LNG Plant - See Photo Below

Cryogenic Onsite Storage Container - See Web Link Below

[http://www.cryocontainers.sos.co.za/pdf/latest/CRYO\_BROCHURE\_ISO\_Bfin.pdf](http://www.cryocontainers.sos.co.za/pdf/latest/CRYO_BROCHURE_ISO_Bfin.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/virginia_pflum/32/17299_2.png) [@Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Virginia_Pflum)
#### Post date: [July 13, 2014, 2:36pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5357 "2014-07-13T14:36:00Z")

</div>

Martha,

Thank you for the picture, now I know what I am looking for. Seems they are finding all ways to make money and not pay the mineral owners.

Once one of my leases expires, it will have another page of addendums.

What a mess this oil business has become.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4da419/32.png) [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 13, 2014, 4:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5358 "2014-07-13T16:05:00Z")

</div>

US Legislation passed to speed up US LNG exports.

US H.R. 6: Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act.

On Passage of the Bill in the House.

Number: House Vote #359 [primary source: [http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll359.xml](http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2014/roll359.xml)]

Date: June 25, 2014 (113th Congress) Result: Passed

> **[H.R. 6 (113th): Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act -- House Vote #359...](https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2014/h359)**
>
> House Vote #359 in 2014, in the United States Congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7c8e57/32.png) [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2014, 5:44am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/5359 "2014-07-15T05:44:00Z")

</div>

**Logan:** Devon Energy Production Co. LP; Marilyn 9-19N-2W No. 1MH Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 of 09-19N-02W; 363 barrels oil per day, 1,168,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 9,955.

[Previous page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427.md?page=174)

[Next page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427.md?page=176)
