# Logan County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427
**Category:** Logan County, OK
**Created:** [June 19, 2011, 3:10am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427 "2011-06-19T03:10:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 120
### Author:  [@ronald\_von\_wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/ronald_von_wilson)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 8:02am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4224 "2013-12-03T08:02:00Z")
db My own understanding is that new pipeline was laid to Ruffed Grouse before production began, and this is why gas was never flared? Let’s think a little, new pipeline, new higher cap pumps, no flaring done, 3 more wells planned, well shut in because of … problems??? I still think it is because of low market price and not any problems with the well. 20 bod is not all that unusual if there are other issues, ie water, at the first. All other indications point to much better production coming.
---
### Author:  [@michael\_carey](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/michael_carey)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 10:35am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4225 "2013-12-03T10:35:00Z")
HAS ANYONE RECEIVED A CHECK FROM BRANSON 26-17N-4W? IT HAS BEEN OVER 6 MONTHS SINCE PRODUCTION STARTED.
---
### Author:  [@Debra\_Acord](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Debra_Acord)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 11:11am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4226 "2013-12-03T11:11:00Z")
not since sid bought them - he says the prior owners probably did cause the well is an old well
---
### Author:  [@michael\_carey](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/michael_carey)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 11:38am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4227 "2013-12-03T11:38:00Z")
the branson 26 17n 4w was drilled from section 23 17n 4w
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 12:28pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4228 "2013-12-03T12:28:00Z")
Debra Acord, What is the legal description of the 105 acres you purchased in March 2013?
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 4:15pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4229 "2013-12-03T16:15:00Z")
TransCanada plans to start deliveries Jan. 3 to Port Arthur, Texas, via the segment of the Keystone expansion project from Cushing, Oklahoma, according to a government filing yesterday December 2, 2103.
[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-03/oil-rises-on-forecasts-for…](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-03/oil-rises-on-forecasts-for-u-s-supply-drop.html)
Brent crude for January delivery was unchanged at $111.45 a barrel at 0314 GMT, after settling $1.76 higher in the previous session. U.S. crude was up 25 cents at $94.07 a barrel, after settling up $1.10 on Monday. [http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/03/markets-oil-idUKL4N0JI0N72…](http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/03/markets-oil-idUKL4N0JI0N720131203)
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 10:45am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4230 "2013-12-03T10:45:00Z")
I could find nothing in 26-17n-4w
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 12:00pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4231 "2013-12-03T12:00:00Z")
Debra Acord, What did Sid buy and when did he buy and do you know the name of the old well and where it is located?
---
### Author:  [@Debra\_Acord](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Debra_Acord)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 12:25pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4232 "2013-12-03T12:25:00Z")
sid bought 105 acres in March of 2013 - we have sold 10 of that 105 in May of 2013 - and have no information on the well -
---
### Author:  [@ronald\_von\_wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/ronald_von_wilson)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 12:38pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4233 "2013-12-03T12:38:00Z")
eatin more beans…
---
### Author:  [@ronald\_von\_wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/ronald_von_wilson)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 4:49pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4235 "2013-12-03T16:49:00Z")
Martha, TransCanada plans are just a little behind schedule, they wanted it operational by first of Dec and that did not happen. We want to be careful, however, about what we read out of the announcement that they would begin operation of the SOUTHERN portion of the Keystone pipeline, which Obama approved and issued a Presidential Proclomation to get it constructed over a year ago. No one should think that the KEYSTONE PIPELINE FROM CANADA has been completed. It has not and in all probability, it will not. Never. They will have to ship their dirty crude to Canadian seaports in order to sell it. Or I am a munkey’s Uncle.
---
### Author:  [@Todd](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Todd)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 8:53am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4236 "2013-12-03T08:53:00Z")
Anyone heard of any developments from multi well from sec23-19n-2w more specifically the well that the bottom hole is under sec-25-19n-2w.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 10:09am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4237 "2013-12-03T10:09:00Z")
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD172DC.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD172DC.pdf)
Todd
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 11:05am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4238 "2013-12-03T11:05:00Z")
Debra, Did you ever receive royalty payments from any well(s) in Sec. 36-15N-02W? Looks like the Checkerboard:Cottage Grove, Wilcox:Viola formations once produced in Sec 36. There are quite a few dry holes which have been plugged. There was a directional survey for the Checkerboard, bottom hole C-SW-SW-SE API # 3508322494 which showed 45 barrels of oil per day and 500 mcf gas per day.
---
### Author:  [@Carol\_R\_Stites](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Carol_R_Stites)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 11:31am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4239 "2013-12-03T11:31:00Z")
Debra, I will have to leave 36-15N-2W to the big Oil Companies, but thanks anyway.
---
### Author:  [@Debra\_Acord](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Debra_Acord)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 12:52pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4241 "2013-12-03T12:52:00Z")
we have 65 ac in NW/4 & 30 ac in SW/4
---
### Author:  [@ronald\_von\_wilson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/ronald_von_wilson)
#### Post date: [December 3, 2013, 4:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4242 "2013-12-03T16:54:00Z")
17-4-23 567 BBL per day.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [December 4, 2013, 6:43am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4243 "2013-12-04T06:43:00Z")
**Logan:** Stephens Production Co.; Vadder No. 1-11-2H Well; NW1/4 NE1/4 NW1/4 NW1/4 (BHL) of 02-17N-04W; 490 barrels oil per day, 626,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 11,225.
---
### Author:  [@Steven\_Holt](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Steven_Holt)
#### Post date: [December 5, 2013, 11:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4244 "2013-12-05T11:16:00Z")
Still awaiting checks from Sundance Energy for the Branson 17-04-26 1HM at the correct royalty percentage. I believe they rushed the checks that we did receive in order to beat the statutory 6 month deadline (for royalty payments from date of production and first sale)----and we have yet to even see a division order!
The well was spudded on 04-04-13 and the Completion Report of record states production began on 05-30-13. What troubles me are the preliminary flow reports / production records we received from our lease holder (also attached) showing the first 4 months of production. Does anyone else note anything strange about these flow records? It certainly gives me reason for pause and reflection!
I’d really be curious to get Robert Brians opinion on this as you’ve worked in the industry as I understand and would be familiar with such records. They are in PDF format so you may have to download them and view them on your computer.
[05-13-13%20Branson%2017-4-26-1HM%20-%20Completion%20Report.pdf](http://api.ning.com:80/files/ghQaMsDvf5XO*FC5e5X7v4LQmKREPvp2OOs4yDABcVsy2BnkC6MuvKXDARUTVomOsyh0g07wVWg4QGR-zRuQiY382qIqRFk9/051313Branson174261HMCompletionReport.pdf)
[branson17-4-26-1hm%20-%20Sheet2.pdf](http://api.ning.com:80/files/ghQaMsDvf5VwoMNA7jRNEJlk9pzPjkX*uqqw8z9WX7RpLBwDrZz-PwHiEAZ-94ZyRUtHWGalqHzxBQZYpWbTtYfHLGTNwIjZ/branson174261hmSheet2.pdf)
[branson17-4-26-1hm%20-%20Sheet3.pdf](http://api.ning.com:80/files/ghQaMsDvf5W2QfsSx8AGr2AhwpCpkEPtl-JPa4bUuIU-LGv0q9hZxj-WOi9iyiWJGOwXdN0GZRcD5Uq*eL3IMbq9teNuI*ok/branson174261hmSheet3.pdf)
[branson17-4-26-1hm%20-%20Sheet4.pdf](http://api.ning.com:80/files/ghQaMsDvf5XcN31CSu7oNmqI8Mc6ms9VdXvPnuiWotwfzZSKm1OpgAsPThy8042-gi372xOCU5gJzEBjPUgfXaptfNe4idwh/branson174261hmSheet4.pdf)
[branson%2017-4-26-1hm%20-%20Sheet5.pdf](http://api.ning.com:80/files/ghQaMsDvf5Ull8KS6XYocBGkyBeLYVhZNy*eP3eRpG6smuBQ9*HtULRQ59s5R5mdGZZg2IbD4q0MJRIyzRD6cUm5C4zF-13i/branson174261hmSheet5.pdf)
Regards
---
### Author:  [@J\_Layman](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/J_Layman)
#### Post date: [December 5, 2013, 11:36am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427/4245 "2013-12-05T11:36:00Z")
Know some one who got $150 per rod with a 50 right of way. Was with One Oak. They had a 75’ work right of way. Good only for three pipes and no additional unless they pay more. I would put a time limit for completion as well. Been 6 months since One Oak scraped off the grass, they have yet to smooth it down and fix the fences.
[Previous page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427.md?page=119)
[Next page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/logan-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1427.md?page=121)