# Lease offer seems low for Canadian County
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/lease-offer-seems-low-for-canadian-county/40921
**Category:** Canadian County, OK
**Created:** [January 30, 2019, 12:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/lease-offer-seems-low-for-canadian-county/40921 "2019-01-30T00:16:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Meredith\_Dickenson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Meredith_Dickenson)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2019, 12:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/lease-offer-seems-low-for-canadian-county/40921/1 "2019-01-30T00:16:34Z")
I have been offered $1,000-3 year-1/5 for property at NE/4, Section 27-T13N-07W in Canadian County. It’s a small acre of land. I am leaning towards the royalty amount, but I think the bonus is too low. I read on this forum that there are pooling agreements with bonuses of 2,000+ in Canadian County. However, not sure if it is in my section.
They want the deep rights to a producing well, Funk 1H-27 (I know this from my royalty checks). I’m new to this so my apologies if this doesn’t make sense. But I think it may be too low an offer. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
---
### Author:  [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:18pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/lease-offer-seems-low-for-canadian-county/40921/2 "2025-01-11T18:18:00Z")