# Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330
**Category:** Garfield County, OK
**Created:** [August 31, 2011, 3:01am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330 "2011-08-31T03:01:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 6
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2013, 1:32pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/521 "2013-03-22T13:32:00Z")
G Win, it said replies are closed for your discussion. Anyway, if I had the Section, Township, and Range, I could look up what is going on.
---
### Author:  [@chad\_elliott](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/chad_elliott)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2013, 11:57pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/522 "2013-03-26T23:57:00Z")
For all he’s done for me, I thought I’d give Ron a little break…
Longfellow Energy LP, Weber No. 19-M1H Well, N/2 NW/4 NW/4 NW/4 (SL) of 19-20N-05W, 472 BOPD, 1,319 MCFPD, TD 10,836 feet.
Longfellow Energy LP, Williams No. 21-M1H Well, NE/4 NW/4 NW/4 NW/4 (SL) of 21-20N-06W, 512 BOPD, 926 MCFPD, TD 9,700 feet.
Longfellow Energy LP, Beebe No. 24-01H Well, SE/4 SE/4 SE/4 SE/4 (SL) of 14-20N-05W, 53.34 BOPD, 139 MCFPD, TD 10,593 feet.
Source: Tulsa World
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [March 28, 2013, 7:48am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/523 "2013-03-28T07:48:00Z")
**Garfield:** Plymouth Exploration LLC; Herbert No. 1-3H Well; N1/2 NW1/4 NE1/4 NE1/4 (SL) of 03-23N-05W; 504 barrels oil per day, 1,218,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,365.
Plymouth Exploration LLC; Holden No. 1-18H Well; E1/2 SW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 18-24N-04W; 220 barrels oil per day, 323,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 9,762.
---
### Author:  [@George\_Leeper](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/George_Leeper)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2013, 6:00pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/524 "2013-04-02T18:00:00Z")
A few months ago I posted about my problems with Breitling Oil and Gas. I was able to separate my 7.5% WI from Breitling.
I recorded the assignment and presented it to Crown Energy, the operator of the Breitling Woodring #1 (35047245230000).
Crown states they have a lawsuit against Breitling and that the well is in suspension.
They say there is no division order, no sales, and no checks to anyone.
Does this sound right to this forum?
---
### Author:  [@Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Virginia_Pflum)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2013, 6:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/525 "2013-04-02T18:05:00Z")
George,
I would check the County Clerk office and see if a lawsuit is on record. If it is, you may be tied up till the suit is settled. You can also check with OCC and see if they can give you a purchaser number to see if anything is being sold.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [April 3, 2013, 7:25am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/526 "2013-04-03T07:25:00Z")
George, what do you mean when you say you were able to separate your 7.5% WI from Breiting? Where is this well located?
---
### Author:  [@George\_Leeper](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/George_Leeper)
#### Post date: [April 16, 2013, 1:30pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/527 "2013-04-16T13:30:00Z")
I requested and got an assignment from Breitling to me, recorded it and presented it to Crown Energy, the operator.
they confirm lawsuit vs Breitling for unpaid JIB bills. still pending.
Thanks, I will update when I know more.
george
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2013, 8:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/528 "2013-04-29T20:08:00Z")
Linda how far from 22- 24n-5w was your $950 lease ?
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2013, 6:58pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/529 "2013-04-29T18:58:00Z")
Drew In a pooling for section 22 Plymouth was ordered to offer $675 for 1/8th, 650 for 3/16th ,500 for 1/5th or no cash and 1/4th. The Co. that pooled 34 was ordered to offer 700 for 1/8th , 650 for 3/16th or 600 for 1/5th
---
### Author:  [@Linda\_Barbour](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Linda_Barbour)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2013, 7:27pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/530 "2013-04-29T19:27:00Z")
Our last renewal bonus from Plymouth last year was for $950 for 3/16th in northern Garfield county.
Although Plymouth is a small operator they have always been very fair with us and we have around 8 different leases with them.
---
### Author:  [@Drew\_Thompson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Drew_Thompson)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2013, 6:33pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/531 "2013-04-29T18:33:00Z")
Plymouth may be preparing to drill in Sect 23, 24N, 5W in which we own mineral rights. Does anyone have current leasing offers or recent leasing terms in northern Garfield County? I appreciate the posts by Chad and Ron on current drilling activity.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [April 30, 2013, 4:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/532 "2013-04-30T04:16:00Z")
Hey Linda, we had an oil company drill on our mineral rights on a place in that area back in 2011 without contacting us about leasing our 80 acres of mineral. (I just found out about this last week). Then it was $500 an acre now they are paying $950? Hope we can get that when they straighten things out! If it had been Plymouth they would have gotten it right as we have leased over 800 acres to them with no problem.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [April 30, 2013, 6:42am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/533 "2013-04-30T06:42:00Z")
M.D. Where was that tract ? I was going to see if I could find out what kind of well they got.
---
### Author:  [@Linda\_Barbour](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Linda_Barbour)
#### Post date: [April 30, 2013, 7:10pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/534 "2013-04-30T19:10:00Z")
When our leases first started in 2009,we were only getting $40 and 5/32 but as the area has developed more the bonuses and royalties keep rising which is a good thing.
Most of our minerals are located in 8 sections bordering the Grant,Garfield county line…North/Northeast of Hunter.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2013, 6:47am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/535 "2013-05-01T06:47:00Z")
M.D. I can look up production info , but the posting is about 5 months behind so they are just to Dec.2012 now . I can also check and see if you were listed on the pooling order which could make you subject to the default option in the pooling.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [April 30, 2013, 10:39pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/536 "2013-04-30T22:39:00Z")
Ron. it is not that good but someone local told me that they got it going a lot better from the completion report.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2013, 6:50am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/537 "2013-05-09T06:50:00Z")
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/AP/Orders/OCC4346231.PDF](http://imaging.occeweb.com/AP/Orders/OCC4346231.PDF)
Drew here is a pooling where they were ordered to offer 1/4th as one of the options . It is next to you. If you would like accept my friend request an I will sent you my # and walk you through the pooling and how they come up for the options in the pooling.
---
### Author:  [@Drew\_Thompson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Drew_Thompson)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2013, 4:02pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/538 "2013-05-08T16:02:00Z")
Plymouth is offering either $650 with 3/16 or $500 with 1/5 in Section 23 of 24N5W. They don’t want to offer 1/4 at all. Someone earlier reported a Plymouth pool that had a zero with 1/4. What is the disadvantage of not signing a lease and taking your chances with the commission at pooling? The representitive is saying Plymouth is giving the two figures above as the numbers they are going to the pool with. Does the Commission ever expand or change the numbers given by the operator? Thanks.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2013, 7:46am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/539 "2013-05-09T07:46:00Z")
**Garfield:** Plymouth Exploration LLC; Peck No. 1-11H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 11-24N-04W; 326 barrels oil per day, 853,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,150.
Plymouth Exploration LLC; Sharon No. 1-10H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 10-24N-04W; 127 barrels oil per day, 620,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,200.
Plymouth Exploration LLC; Tennyson No. 1-20H Well; NW1/4 NE1/4 NE1/4 NW1/4 (SL) of 20-24N-04W; 93 barrels oil per day, 300,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 9,420.
**Payne:** Calyx Energy LLC; Dean No. 34-2MH Well; NE1/4 NW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 (SL) of 03-18N-04E; 129 barrels oil per day, 523,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 8,248.
---
### Author:  [@JW\_Anderson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/JW_Anderson)
#### Post date: [May 9, 2013, 1:35pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/540 "2013-05-09T13:35:00Z")
Ron:
I really appreciate your comments on this forum. With regard to the request from Drew about pooling, there are several of us who have in interest in what you might be able to share with the group or any resource you can direct us to. It seems there are sometimes advantages to pooling; for example, pooling is limited to the formations listed in the order. A disadvantage might be that you cannot dictate terms as you could by including your own addendum to the lease.
In particular,
1. How do they come up with the pooling numbers? And why, for goodness sakes, is 1/8 still allowed as an option, especially in areas of big production?
2. If you are force pooled, how are you treated with regard to “deductions” in gas sales - something that you would normally take care of in an addendum to your lease?
3. The people with “address unknown” get stuck with the absolute worst option (usually 1/8). If these people are later found, do they have any recourse with regard to selection of an option? This one is of particular interest to me.
Thanks in advance.
[Previous page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=5)
[Next page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=7)