# Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330
**Category:** Garfield County, OK
**Created:** [August 31, 2011, 3:01am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330 "2011-08-31T03:01:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 37
### Author:  [@Tim\_West](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Tim_West)
#### Post date: [November 19, 2014, 2:14pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1149 "2014-11-19T14:14:00Z")
If it’s as good as the Springer secret that Continental sat on for two years, the wait will be well worth it!
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 19, 2014, 2:31pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1150 "2014-11-19T14:31:00Z")
Secret rare earth elements like platinum and yttrium for use in fuel cells. Deborah, it may be more like Star Trek than The Twilight Zone.
---
### Author:  [@Michael\_Hunter](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Michael_Hunter)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2014, 8:11pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1151 "2014-11-18T20:11:00Z")
Thanks for the information. I wonder if there are any of the old wells pumping? How to find out.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2014, 11:06pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1152 "2014-11-18T23:06:00Z")
Martha, Oklahoma Corp Commission page, oil/gas database, well browse, Section 27, Township 21N, Range 3W. All images, 1002A # 500333325, shows completion report completion date 8/1/2014, 1st production date 8/1/2014, date tested 8/12/2014 Woodford formation. Am I crazy or what? Devon said they haven’t completed it yet per phone conversation today.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2014, 11:19pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1153 "2014-11-18T23:19:00Z")
Martha, also on the Oklahoma OCC Images oil/gas transportation report 300R for August 2014 Devon shows that Eason 27\_22 27N 3W 541 runs of (1) crude oil. I am beginning to feel like I am in the Twilight Zone.
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 19, 2014, 8:36am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1154 "2014-11-19T08:36:00Z")
Deborah, good news, you’re not in the twilight zone and you probably have a good Woodford well. The OCC has allowed Devon to code the well confidential, which means it’s a secret (aka a ‘tight hole’), meaning the operator can require the well as secret as possible. Look at the (WHX) after the well name. The WH means Woodford Horizontal and the X means confidential.
> **[1DD27B0D.pdf](https://imaging.occ.ok.gov/OG/Well%20Records/1DD27B0D.pdf)**
>
> 461.61 KB
---
### Author:  [@Michael\_Hunter](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Michael_Hunter)
#### Post date: [November 19, 2014, 1:21pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1155 "2014-11-19T13:21:00Z")
Congratulations Deborah on your good news.
---
### Author:  [@Michael\_Hunter](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Michael_Hunter)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2014, 8:47pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1156 "2014-11-18T20:47:00Z")
Thanks again for your thoughts, Deborah. I haven’t had any experience with the oil and gas research.
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 9:41pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1157 "2014-11-20T21:41:00Z")
Deborah, They probably found a new formation and if they produced the new formation it wouldn’t be a secret anymore. They have to produce something or they would lose the lease, so they produce the Woodford until they decide to release the confidential information.
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 4:49pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1158 "2014-11-20T16:49:00Z")
Deborah, It has been completed, but it’s coded confidential. I think Devon is going a little too far and they should at least tell you it is coded confidential, but Devon employees can be fired for giving a report on a confidential well, so they zip it.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 4:30pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1159 "2014-11-20T16:30:00Z")
Ok, I am backing off of this for awhile. Devon said on Tuesday the Eason Well Section 27 Township 21N Range 3W was not complete, but everyone on the Corporation Commission side says it is. Not putting a lot of stock into this anymore. It is what it is, and I will believe it when I see it.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 8:20pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1160 "2014-11-20T20:20:00Z")
It’s not a big producer, why would they have it coded confidential?
---
### Author:  [@W\_Schweer](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/W_Schweer)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2014, 12:02pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1161 "2014-11-21T12:02:00Z")
I don’t believe that the X means confidential. It is a designation that it is an extended horizontal. Meaning that it is being drilled across Section lines. Over 5000 feet.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 10:49pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1162 "2014-11-20T22:49:00Z")
I hope so, otherwise I would rather have a lease renewal again. I remember my partner telling me that leases are sometimes better than the actual well. I will be 61 next week so maybe I will see something happen in my lifetime. ha
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [November 20, 2014, 10:50pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1163 "2014-11-20T22:50:00Z")
Virginia, we’ve missed you!
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2014, 9:29am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1164 "2014-11-21T09:29:00Z")
Deborah, Oklahoma Tax Commission reports Status: Active.
[https://www4.oktax.onenet.net/GrossProduction/PublicSearchPUNbyLegal.php](https://www4.oktax.onenet.net/GrossProduction/PublicSearchPUNbyLegal.php)
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2014, 2:09pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1165 "2014-11-21T14:09:00Z")
W Schweer, You are right, the well is on 1280 spacing, but I had a well coded X in Payne County that was not over 5000 ft and OCC told me it was coded confidential.
---
### Author:  [@Myranda\_Shugart](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Myranda_Shugart)
#### Post date: [December 2, 2014, 10:09am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1166 "2014-12-02T10:09:00Z")
Tim, Great looking page!
---
### Author:  [@Tim\_West](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Tim_West)
#### Post date: [December 2, 2014, 9:55am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1167 "2014-12-02T09:55:00Z")
I would like to introduce a new service my company debuted last month called OK Energy [Today.com](http://Today.com). It’s a daily newsletter which comes to your inbox every day, and delivers energy news headlines from Oklahoma and the industry. Click on the story and you are sent to our website with full story details. It’s free to join, just hit the subscribe button at [http://okenergytoday.com/](http://okenergytoday.com/). Besides daily energy news we will provide daily Permit to Drill reports and Completion Reports, all with Google Map links so you can actually see where the wells are located. There is also a forum page that is just starting up where you can post comments as well. Please give it a try!
---
### Author:  [@Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Virginia_Pflum)
#### Post date: [December 2, 2014, 10:03am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1168 "2014-12-02T10:03:00Z")
Tim West,
Thank you. Your site should be a great help to all of us.
Virginia
[Previous page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=36)
[Next page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=38)