# Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives
**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330
**Category:** Garfield County, OK
**Created:** [August 31, 2011, 3:01am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330 "2011-08-31T03:01:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 30
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2014, 3:36pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1007 "2014-07-15T15:36:00Z")
Deborah and Virginia, In the Woodford Shale of Oklahoma, Continental Resources says the gas they produce is so “wet” with other liquids like butane and propane that they can get at least $8 per mmbtu, far more than the going rate of $4.32 for dry gas.
Concerning ‘Wet’ Woodford Shale Gas…
That is understood to mean gas liquids, even condensate, see article below
[http://www.oilandgasinvestor.com/Exploration-Production-Industry-News/At-Heart-Oklahoma\_123698](http://www.oilandgasinvestor.com/Exploration-Production-Industry-News/At-Heart-Oklahoma_123698)
Also,
Recovery factors of 15% to 30% for shale gas (wet gas) and 3% to 7% for shale oil
[http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf](http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf)
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2014, 8:17am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1008 "2014-07-20T08:17:00Z")
Very little leasing and no well information by Red Fork.
---
### Author:  [@Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Virginia_Pflum)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2014, 9:38am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1009 "2014-07-20T09:38:00Z")
Berenice,
There is very little leasing going on, but I have heard it will pick up in the fall as lots of leases will expire in October to December.
I don’t know where Red Fork is drilling in Garfield County, they have several wells in North Noble County and was moving east last I heard. They seem to be a good company so far.
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2014, 12:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1010 "2014-07-20T12:54:00Z")
Berenice, Companies are raising cash for infill drilling and are consolidating their core positions. For example, Devon just sold Arkoma position to Linn Co and reported their debt reduced. Here’s Redfork’s Quarterly Report dated March 2014 that states their “2014 Forward Development Plan.” OCC me told that there are a lot more wells to be drilled. [http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20140501/pdf/42pcc83d8kxdyx.pdf](http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20140501/pdf/42pcc83d8kxdyx.pdf)
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [July 23, 2014, 8:01am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1011 "2014-07-23T08:01:00Z")
I just read where the Getty in 21 21N 3W was published as completed; a very small well. May not be a good sign! Something like 34 barrels.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [July 23, 2014, 9:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1012 "2014-07-23T09:40:00Z")
Looks like another Corporation Commission delay on Section 27, 21N, 3W Garfield County. 1st schedule was June 10, then July 22, now August 19th. Still no well completions or anything acknowledged by Devon. I am beginning to think this could go on for a year. I try to teach people about patience, but apparently I need to follow my own words. I just see where other companies file reports, list completions, etc that are a lot newer wells than ours.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [July 24, 2014, 9:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1013 "2014-07-24T09:40:00Z")
Correction chooses!
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [July 24, 2014, 9:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1014 "2014-07-24T09:40:00Z")
I am wondering how and why Devon chooses to report some well completions and tests, like the Getty a few Sections over, drilled and then completed within a few months and already reported. Not a good well, but at least they know it’s not a good well! Would have thought when they fracked they would have fracked several in the area and completed at the same time. Just wondering!
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [July 24, 2014, 12:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1015 "2014-07-24T12:08:00Z")
Well a conversation with a very helpful lady at the Corporation Commission let us finally find out about the well status. No completion has been filed, no production has been filed, nothing, still hope I guess. Ha
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [July 31, 2014, 7:14am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1016 "2014-07-31T07:14:00Z")
**Garfield:** SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Bowen 2407 No. 1-30H Well; SE1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 30-24N-07W; 528 barrels oil per day, 3,216,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,909.
SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Carlson Trust 2407 No. 1-15H Well; S1/2 SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 15-24N-07W; 157.75 barrels oil per day, 752,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,628.
SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; CF Land 2407 No. 1-31H Well; NE1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 30-24N-07W; 324 barrels oil per day, 699,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 11,454.
---
### Author:  [@Ron\_McKenzie](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ron_McKenzie)
#### Post date: [August 4, 2014, 6:54am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1017 "2014-08-04T06:54:00Z")
Brian, they have some wells in the section next to you in 1.
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1D70F.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD1D70F.pdf)
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD24399.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD24399.pdf)
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD238B9.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD238B9.pdf)
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD2499E.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD2499E.pdf)
[http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD238B8.pdf](http://imaging.occeweb.com/OG/Well%20Records/1DD238B8.pdf)
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2014, 6:38am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1018 "2014-08-18T06:38:00Z")
Virginia, looking at the latest info from Mr. Pepper, I still believe I am on a 640 spacing. If otherwise I don’t know it.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2014, 6:18am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1019 "2014-08-18T06:18:00Z")
Section 27 Township 21N Range 3W goes back to the Corporation Commission tomorrow, hopefully it doesn’t get rescheduled again. Just want to finally know something.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2014, 6:42am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1020 "2014-08-18T06:42:00Z")
This link is not operable.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2014, 5:42pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1021 "2014-08-20T17:42:00Z")
Well once again Section 27 Township 21N Range 3W has been rescheduled until September 19. Am really not for sure what the hold up is but oh well!
---
### Author:  [@Virginia\_Pflum](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Virginia_Pflum)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2014, 5:59pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1022 "2014-08-20T17:59:00Z")
Deborah,
I think I would email Devon and see why they are having to re-space it all the time.
---
### Author:  [@Deborah\_Lynne\_Gerst](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Deborah_Lynne_Gerst)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2014, 11:17pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1023 "2014-08-20T23:17:00Z")
Virginia, I am really not for sure what is going on with Devon and this Eason well, Section 27 Township 21N Range 3W. I just know it had been rescheduled 4 times now. I am truly beginning to wonder if they’ve found anything at all, maybe scared to admit to the Chinese that they made a mistake. Ha. I am so ready for this to be over, don’t know if I could go through another well or not. I did call Devon before and never heard back. I just truly believe someone knows something about this well. Then again I’ve noticed that on all of the Devon HXL wells in Garfield County that nothing has been released on any of them. Top Secret I suppose.
---
### Author:  [@Linda\_Barbour](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Linda_Barbour)
#### Post date: [August 22, 2014, 12:41pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1024 "2014-08-22T12:41:00Z")
Meant division orders…
---
### Author:  [@Martha\_McMorries](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Martha_McMorries)
#### Post date: [August 22, 2014, 10:25am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1025 "2014-08-22T10:25:00Z")
Deborah, you are so right about the secrets. Companies collect tons of info from the new wells to determine what to do next and that info is considered a ‘trade secret’. People who see this info have to sign ‘will not disclose trade secrets’ agreements and get in big trouble if they leak the info.
---
### Author:  [@Linda\_Barbour](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Linda_Barbour)
#### Post date: [August 22, 2014, 12:58pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330/1026 "2014-08-22T12:58:00Z")
Virginia,
Believe the first payment needs to be received 6 months after the first sale but the division order needs to be sent no later than 6 months after well completion, someone please correct me if this is wrong.
Devon has already posted initial production results for the wells so I am going on the assumption that the wells are producing, hope I am right.
[Previous page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=29)
[Next page](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/garfield-county-ok-oil-gas-discussion-archives/1330.md?page=31)