# Forced Pooling in Section Section 5 & 8, T 17 N, R 7 W? **URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/forced-pooling-in-section-section-5-8-t-17-n-r-7-w/41712 **Category:** Kingfisher County, OK **Created:** [February 14, 2019, 10:59pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/forced-pooling-in-section-section-5-8-t-17-n-r-7-w/41712 "2019-02-14T22:59:17Z") **Posts on this page:** 3 **Page:** 1
### Author: ![Richard\_Winblad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/richard_winblad/32/11511_2.png) [@Richard\_Winblad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Richard_Winblad) #### Post date: [February 14, 2019, 10:59pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/forced-pooling-in-section-section-5-8-t-17-n-r-7-w/41712/1 "2019-02-14T22:59:17Z")
A letter stated that Newfield was considering a multi-unit horizontal well. Couldn’t find records thereof nor any pooling orders. Would love help from anybody, case numbers will be fine. ---
### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes) #### Post date: [February 15, 2019, 1:40pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/forced-pooling-in-section-section-5-8-t-17-n-r-7-w/41712/2 "2019-02-15T13:40:37Z")
I do not see any new ones. There is already a horizontal well in 5 (Big Sky 1707 #1UMH-5 from 2017) so it would probably not need a new pooling order unless it is a different reservoir. If a new well goes into 8, I don’t see any OCC cases yet. Just new ones in 16 and 21. ---
### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV) #### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:07pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/forced-pooling-in-section-section-5-8-t-17-n-r-7-w/41712/3 "2025-01-11T18:07:46Z")