# Eminent domain re pipeline easement

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502
**Category:** Leon County, TX
**Created:** [November 4, 2025, 3:53am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502 "2025-11-04T03:53:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/8e7dd6/32.png) [@chuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/chuck)
#### Post date: [November 4, 2025, 3:53am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502/1 "2025-11-04T03:53:56Z")

</div>

Can a private pipeline utilize eminent domain to initiate condemnation proceedings for a pipeline easement? I can appreciate that a common carrier pipeline, publicly regulated, can claim it serves the public good. But a private pipeline seems a stretch? If they can, what’s to stop a power company from condemning 2,000 acres for a solar panel installation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TennisDaze](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dbc845/32.png) [@TennisDaze](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TennisDaze)
#### Post date: [November 4, 2025, 4:32am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502/2 "2025-11-04T04:32:16Z")

</div>

A private pipeline can qualify as a common carrier in Texas. It is not restricted to publicly traded companies. The test is whether it will carry oil or gas for third parties, not just their own products. [https://agrilife.org/texasaglaw/2014/03/31/eminent-domain-in-texas-part-3-oil-and-gas-pipelines/](https://agrilife.org/texasaglaw/2014/03/31/eminent-domain-in-texas-part-3-oil-and-gas-pipelines/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/8e7dd6/32.png) [@chuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/chuck)
#### Post date: [November 4, 2025, 12:36pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502/3 "2025-11-04T12:36:21Z")

</div>

Thank you for the explanation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sfchuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/e9bcb4/32.png) [@sfchuck](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/sfchuck)
#### Post date: [November 4, 2025, 12:57pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502/4 "2025-11-04T12:57:35Z")

</div>

They can also call it a “gas gathering pipeline” and invoke eminent domain. Otherwise, supposedly, the gas would have to be flared, resulting in economic waste—so, a public good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [February 2, 2026, 3:54am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/eminent-domain-re-pipeline-easement/84502/5 "2026-02-02T03:54:40Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
