# Email vs certified letter for documentation

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821
**Category:** General Mineral Rights Discussion
**Created:** [December 20, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821 "2024-12-20T18:39:28Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![21macdad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/21macdad/32/20923_2.png) [@21macdad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/21macdad)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821/1 "2024-12-20T18:39:28Z")

</div>

Does an email request work as documented contact for non payment? I have them admitting that they owe me. Never got paid. Been 4 months.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2024, 1:32pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821/2 "2024-12-31T13:32:26Z")

</div>

It depends upon the state. In some states, the certified letter return receipt starts a statutory process in which they must answer within a certain number of days. And it provides a paper trail. Try again and put SECOND REQUEST at the top of the page.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![James\_Garner1](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/james_garner1/32/20760_2.png) [@James\_Garner1](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/James_Garner1)
#### Post date: [January 1, 2025, 12:04am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821/3 "2025-01-01T00:04:33Z")

</div>

A little more detail is required for the best response. As @M_Barnes stated, a certified letter may be required if there is a statutory issue. If this is a production/sales issue, then email may be sufficient with a little diligence. I prefer to use email threads with many companies to indicate that I am diligently attempting to resolve an issue. When dealing with owner relations, you need to recognize that you may be trying to work with sub-contract services which generally delays the process. Good luck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![21macdad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/21macdad/32/20923_2.png) [@21macdad](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/21macdad)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 1:16am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821/4 "2025-01-11T01:16:59Z")

</div>

Thank you and Ms. Barnes for your input.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2025, 6:40pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/email-vs-certified-letter-for-documentation/78821/5 "2025-03-20T18:40:27Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
