# Divison Order discrepancy - Reagan Core in Reagan County

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/divison-order-discrepancy-reagan-core-in-reagan-county/64301
**Category:** Division Orders
**Created:** [December 22, 2021, 3:44pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/divison-order-discrepancy-reagan-core-in-reagan-county/64301 "2021-12-22T15:44:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jaynie36](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/ecb155/32.png) [@Jaynie36](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Jaynie36)
#### Post date: [December 22, 2021, 3:44pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/divison-order-discrepancy-reagan-core-in-reagan-county/64301/1 "2021-12-22T15:44:54Z")

</div>

Received division order for “reagan core” - took a lot of research for me to confirm that my records for section 21/Block E/ Gerogetown RR Co. Survey matches what they are talking about!..My records date b back to 1962 and list 3/128th royalty with a .0029297 interest… Division order states “3/1024 of 0.26587396 for 0.00151249” - have been unable to get resolved as of yet with ConocoPhillips - (emails have been exchanged, but no one-on-one communication as of yet- voice messages not returned except by email with no new explanations)…should I sign division order as is? should I attach a letter with my documentation saying I disagree with their findings?.. this division order is pending - and relates to a lost piece of mail since 2018 - royalty checks have been on hold - advise appreciated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AimeeHess](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/aimeehess/32/14148_2.png) [@AimeeHess](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/AimeeHess)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2021, 1:09am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/divison-order-discrepancy-reagan-core-in-reagan-county/64301/2 "2021-12-23T01:09:42Z")

</div>

Unless you own the entire tract, your ownership percentage for division order purposes is further reduced by multiplying by a fraction in which your net mineral acres are the numerator and the total acres in the tract are the denominator.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [March 22, 2022, 3:45pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/divison-order-discrepancy-reagan-core-in-reagan-county/64301/3 "2022-03-22T15:45:27Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
