# Completion Report-Well Name:CONSTITUTION 1-6

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864
**Category:** Logan County, OK
**Created:** [July 19, 2012, 5:26pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864 "2012-07-19T17:26:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Clint\_Liles](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/clint_liles/32/16995_2.png) [@Clint\_Liles](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Clint_Liles)
#### Post date: [July 19, 2012, 5:26pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/1 "2012-07-19T17:26:18Z")

</div>

Purchaser/Measurer:

First Sales Date: There are no Plug records to display. Depth Plug Type

API No.: 35083240020000

Single Zone Multiple Zone Commingled

Completion Type Casing and Cement SURFACE 8 5/8 24 J-55 422 250 250 SURFACE Type Size Weight Grade Feet PSI SAX Top of CMT Plug

There are no Packer records to display.

Depth Brand & Type Packer There are no Liner records to display.

Type Size Weight Grade Length PSI SAX Top Depth Bottom Depth Liner

Total Depth: 6319

1st Prod Date:

Completion Date: May 15, 2012

Spud Date: May 08, 2012

Drilling Finished Date: May 15, 2012

Oklahoma Corporation Commission Oil & Gas Conservation Division Post Office Box 52000 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73152-2000

Rule 165: 10-3-25 Form 1002A

Operator: O’BRIEN OIL CORPORATION 22501

201 W Oklahoma Ave Ste 233 Guthrie, Oklahoma 73044-3154

Location: Logan County 6, Township 18N, Range 3W E2 SW NW SW

1650 FSL 495 FWL of 1/4 Section

Derrick Elevation: 945 Ground Elevation: 934

There are no Location Exception records to display. Order No Location Exception There are no Increased Density records to display. Order No Increased Density

Drill Type: Straight Hole

July 19, 2012

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Clint\_Liles](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/clint_liles/32/16995_2.png) [@Clint\_Liles](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Clint_Liles)
#### Post date: [July 19, 2012, 8:14pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/2 "2012-07-19T20:14:21Z")

</div>

It appears to this Forum member that this is a dry hole. Maybe not. The Constitution 1-6 drilled through 12 formations.

Tonkawa---------3784’ Avant-----------4032’ Perry Gas Sand----4142’ Layton----------4608’ Checkerboard----4994’ Big Lime--------5180’ Mississippi------5538’ Woodford-------5870’ Hunton---------5941’ Sylvan----------5992’ Viola-----------6086’ Second Wilcox----6282’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![db11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/f17d59/32.png) [@db11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/db11)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2012, 1:36am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/3 "2012-07-20T01:36:56Z")

</div>

What is your opinion of drilling 11,000 ft in 15N 2W? Is it too deep for the area?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Richard\_Pruitt](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/richard_pruitt/32/4314_2.png) [@Richard\_Pruitt](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Richard_Pruitt)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2012, 1:51am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/4 "2012-07-20T01:51:30Z")

</div>

db without knowing the section to check I would bet that is a horizontal well with about 5,000 feet of lateral and vertical of about 6,000 ft to make the 11,000 feet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![db11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/f17d59/32.png) [@db11](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/db11)
#### Post date: [July 20, 2012, 2:00am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/5 "2012-07-20T02:00:50Z")

</div>

No, 10,600 ft vertical is the plan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![william\_tompkins](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/william_tompkins/32/3840_2.png) [@william\_tompkins](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/william_tompkins)
#### Post date: [July 24, 2012, 10:21pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/6 "2012-07-24T22:21:22Z")

</div>

db said:

> no, 10,600 ft vertical is the plan db I would find the “Document file” for this well and check everything that’s posted. I see that what you posted says total depth is 6,319’ and that makes sense with the pay zone list. I also see that it says Multiple zone Commingled. Find that Document file that’s your best bet!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 3:34am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/completion-report-well-name-constitution-1-6/20864/7 "2018-08-15T03:34:31Z")

</div>


