# Bottom of the Hole

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343
**Category:** General Mineral Rights Discussion
**Created:** [August 30, 2010, 9:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343 "2010-08-30T21:05:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_Mason](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/d26b3c/32.png) [@David\_Mason](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/David_Mason)
#### Post date: [August 30, 2010, 9:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343/1 "2010-08-30T21:05:18Z")

</div>

I have property that I have leased that they will soon drill a well on. The pool of oil is directly under my leased property. My brother also has mineral rights there. Someone told him that we would receive more royalty because our leased property was at the “bottom of the hole.”

Is this just nonsense or is there anything to this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DJG](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/djg/32/4831_2.png) [@DJG](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/DJG)
#### Post date: [August 31, 2010, 2:23am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343/2 "2010-08-31T02:23:47Z")

</div>

You could potentially see more $$$ should the O&G company desire to use some of your surface acreage as their pad site (and if you did not give away surface usage rights in your original lease), but it would not generally matter where your minerals are located within the unit as far as getting additional royalty. If your minerals are pooled in a unit, you would get the royalty amount negotiated in your lease contract pro-rated against the percentage amount of the total number acres that you personally own in the unit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_Mason](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/d26b3c/32.png) [@David\_Mason](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/David_Mason)
#### Post date: [August 31, 2010, 1:30pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343/3 "2010-08-31T13:30:25Z")

</div>

We don’t have surface rights and they have already purchased the pad site. I figured we would just get what the lease allowed. Someone told my brother this and since we aren’t up to speed on everything related to leasing I thought I would check it out.

Thank you for the information.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![anon46780133](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a4c791/32.png) [@anon46780133](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/anon46780133)
#### Post date: [March 12, 2011, 3:45am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343/4 "2011-03-12T03:45:20Z")

</div>

Everyone in the unit shares equally (proportionally). Your property may look better geologically, but you are either in or out, not in a superior position except as to number of acres in the unit. Surface rights would be the only mitigating factor, but are not a part of the equation here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 4:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/bottom-of-the-hole/24343/5 "2018-08-15T04:40:04Z")

</div>


