# Baker 2-29 Coffeyville Resources

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274
**Category:** McClain County, OK
**Created:** [March 18, 2019, 10:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274 "2019-03-18T22:08:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ann_Cole)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2019, 10:08pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/1 "2019-03-18T22:08:03Z")

</div>

We signed and returned a division order from Coffeyville for 29-5N-3W NW 1/4 in June 2018 but have not heard anything further. What are we to expect? As this was leased many years ago to another operator when my father and mother were alive, is it unreasonable to request a copy of the lease they are operating under? Our decimal interest is only 0.00013077 RI. What does this mean?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2019, 10:28pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/2 "2019-03-18T22:28:02Z")

</div>

Coffeyville operates some very old fields which they took over from other operators. You can ask for a copy of the lease, but they may not have it or it is “in storage”. The decimal interest is derived from a formula that is net acres/spacing acres x royalty x % perforations in your section. If they are operating a very old well, then the last term is not relevant since it is for multi-section wells. Your check should change from the previous operator to Coffeyville. If it is a water flood, then that is a different story. Is this the Baker 2-29 or did it have another well name on it.?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ann_Cole)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2019, 10:29pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/3 "2019-03-18T22:29:49Z")

</div>

Their description just says Baker 2-29.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2019, 11:21pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/4 "2019-03-18T23:21:45Z")

</div>

That well has been online since 1985. Ir was fairly stable until late 2-15. It is still online, but barely. I wouldn’t expect too much left in royalties.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Ann\_Cole](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ann_Cole)
#### Post date: [March 19, 2019, 12:29am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/5 "2019-03-19T00:29:13Z")

</div>

Ms. Barnes Thank you for your input.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:04pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/baker-2-29-coffeyville-resources/43274/6 "2025-01-11T18:04:05Z")

</div>


