# April 9, 2019 OCC Hearing Docket on 3-18n-13W. CD 201708540 and 541

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696
**Category:** Blaine County, OK
**Created:** [April 18, 2019, 2:55pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696 "2019-04-18T14:55:51Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lanny\_Edward\_Sells](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Lanny\_Edward\_Sells](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Lanny_Edward_Sells)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2019, 2:55pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696/1 "2019-04-18T14:55:51Z")

</div>

I’m wondering what this case Disp is about, and why now? Devon sold the well they drilled in Sections 3 and 34 over a year ago. I understood that they sold all of their interest in those sections too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2019, 5:43pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696/2 "2019-04-18T17:43:11Z")

</div>

Regardless of who the operator is, you need to have Location Exceptions and Multi-Unit Applications recommended by the OCC before production can occur.

Todd M. Baker

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lanny\_Edward\_Sells](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Lanny\_Edward\_Sells](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Lanny_Edward_Sells)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2019, 10:10pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696/3 "2019-04-18T22:10:45Z")

</div>

Todd, I’m pretty certain all of that was taken care of a year ago. Derby is the operator now, and they are now in flowback stage on the Pioneer 3\_34-18N-13W well. Could this new filing in April of 2019 be for another new well? If not, why would the OCC have postponed the case until 6-4-2019?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2019, 1:43pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696/4 "2019-04-19T13:43:04Z")

</div>

The cases are still pending. Protests were filed, requests for emergency hearings were filed, then dismissed. Nothing but administrative work. To my knowledge, there are no new wells being proposed. I don’t think this well has been frac’d yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:19pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/april-9-2019-occ-hearing-docket-on-3-18n-13w-cd-201708540-and-541/44696/5 "2025-01-11T18:19:35Z")

</div>


