# After divorce ist wifes children

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165
**Category:** Law & Legal
**Created:** [March 25, 2014, 4:38am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165 "2014-03-25T04:38:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 14
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 4:38am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/1 "2014-03-25T04:38:43Z")

</div>

If grandfather left royalty interest to his son and heirs, he died, then everything goes to the son. If son married, had two children, then divorced, remarried, had two more children, but in son’s will left everything including royalty interest to the second wife, the second wife picked one of the four children to receive the royalty interest when she died. Do the other children have rights to the royalty interest? I get confused when they mention separate property and community property. Or is that only when there is no will?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 4:40am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/2 "2014-03-25T04:40:20Z")

</div>

The title should have said (after divorce first wife children concern).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/3ec8ea/32.png) [@r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/r_w_kennedy)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 6:34am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/3 "2014-03-25T06:34:28Z")

</div>

Did the second wife leave a will? Just picking people won’t work unless everyone agrees, in writing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 10:37am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/4 "2014-03-25T10:37:03Z")

</div>

Yes, it said it went to one daughter, not to any of the siblings and step-siblings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janie\_Newborg](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/janie_newborg/32/1927_2.png) [@Janie\_Newborg](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Janie_Newborg)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 4:42pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/5 "2014-03-25T16:42:47Z")

</div>

In that case, that would prevail. As long as there are wills, unless you are willing to contest those wills which could be very lengthy and expensive, the daughter is the heir to the mineral rights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wade\_caldwell](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/wade_caldwell/32/9599_2.png) [@wade\_caldwell](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/wade_caldwell)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 7:45pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/6 "2014-03-25T19:45:48Z")

</div>

So did grandfather leave part to the heirs to begin with, or just the son? That might make a difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/3ec8ea/32.png) [@r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/r_w_kennedy)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2014, 8:33pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/7 "2014-03-25T20:33:41Z")

</div>

Did grandfather have any heirs besides the son?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2014, 3:49am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/8 "2014-03-26T03:49:01Z")

</div>

The grandfather had 6 children, left royalties equally to each of the 6 children and their heirs. One of the 6 children (the only one that was divorced and remarried and had 2 children with each wife), when he died in his will everything went to the 2nd wife. In her will when she died, she gave everything to the living daughter. The other daughter had died but had 2 children, but wasn’t given any of the royalties. As far as the grandfather’s 5 other children, it had all gone to the heirs equally.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janie\_Newborg](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/janie_newborg/32/1927_2.png) [@Janie\_Newborg](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Janie_Newborg)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2014, 1:57pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/9 "2014-03-26T13:57:33Z")

</div>

It seems pretty cut and dried to me. The second wife was under no obligation to leave anything to her step-children and the mineral rights were hers at the time of her death. Depending on what state all of this happened in, the stepchildren could contest the wills of both their father and their stepmother but this could take years and thousands of dollars and would likely yield nothing. The time to contest the will would have been when the father died, not the stepmother. In Minnesota, contesting would not even be considered as long as the wills were properly prepared and executed.

On what grounds do you believe the stepchildren would have a claim?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/3ec8ea/32.png) [@r\_w\_kennedy](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/r_w_kennedy)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2014, 7:32pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/10 "2014-03-26T19:32:30Z")

</div>

Before we get off track, I believe we are only concerned with the part of the “royalties” which I think means mineral rights, left to the son?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2014, 12:31pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/11 "2014-03-27T12:31:59Z")

</div>

there is only royalties, it says in royalty deed to have and to hold the above described property and rights, together with all and singular rights and appurtenances thereto in a wise belonging unto the said grantees, and their heirs, administrators, executors and assigns forever;

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![anon1357054](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/8baadc/32.png) [@anon1357054](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/anon1357054)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2014, 6:34am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/12 "2014-04-09T06:34:30Z")

</div>

From the information presented, I say “NO,” the other children are not entitled to any of the royalties.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/nancy_peterson/32/4590_2.png) [@nancy\_peterson](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/nancy_peterson)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2014, 12:41pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/13 "2014-04-09T12:41:13Z")

</div>

Thank you, that is what I thought was true.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 12:49am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/after-divorce-ist-wifes-children/11165/14 "2018-08-15T00:49:14Z")

</div>


