# Activity in Caddo 29 09N 11W?

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310
**Category:** Caddo County, OK
**Created:** [December 23, 2021, 6:51pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310 "2021-12-23T18:51:39Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ac8455/32.png) [@pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/pskinner)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2021, 6:51pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/1 "2021-12-23T18:51:39Z")

</div>

I’ve been following case # 201902847 but saw “This matter was DMOA on 09/21/2021” on the OCC website. So I thought nothing was happening.

But a family member recently received what looks like a lease offer letter (I’ll attach a copy when I figure out how to do that so you can see exact wording). It’s from King Energy for: Swan Lake 1-29 1H, Section 29-9N-11W, Caddo County Oklahoma.

Sounds like there IS some activity. I don’t have a case # so I don’t know how to look-up on the OCC website. Any insights are appreciated, thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2021, 7:15pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/2 "2021-12-23T19:15:23Z")

</div>

I don’t see any new filings in this section. The last was the dismissed Inc. Density filing you notes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ac8455/32.png) [@pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/pskinner)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2021, 10:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/3 "2021-12-23T22:54:37Z")

</div>

Thank you Todd! I should have mentioned, since this is a horizontal well, that the letter said: “The surface location will be in the NE/4 of Section 32 and the lateral will extend north into the E/2 of Section 29-9N-11W.”

I believe I’ve seen in other postings that the filing may be in the surface location. I didn’t think to check that until just now. Sorry, still getting used to this business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ac8455/32.png) [@pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/pskinner)
#### Post date: [December 29, 2021, 12:39am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/4 "2021-12-29T00:39:34Z")

</div>

Just heard from a family member that there is a proposed horizontal well starting in section 32, extending to our section 29-9N-11W. But I can’t seem to get any info from the OCC website without a case #. Would anyone be able to find that case #? I’d like to know status of the well. Thanks for any help!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [December 29, 2021, 1:35am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/5 "2021-12-29T01:35:51Z")

</div>

It appears that the well has only been proposed at this time. There are no new OCC filings related to these 2 sections.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hilary](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/d2c977/32.png) [@Hilary](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Hilary)
#### Post date: [January 18, 2022, 5:58pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/6 "2022-01-18T17:58:47Z")

</div>

Hello mineral rights owner of 156 acres Section 32 T7N R13W. I have been contacted by RES requesting a surface waiver for development of a utility scale solar farm. They offered $1,000 to waive my rights (which seems like nothing). Any suggestions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [January 19, 2022, 2:31pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/7 "2022-01-19T14:31:00Z")

</div>

You would need to track down an attorney who specializes in solar. That sounds like a very small amount for a massive use of your property for solar for a very long time. There are some places that do agriculture compatibly with solar panels. Lots of research to do before entering a contract on your surface. Search online, search the major university websites, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ac8455/32.png) [@pskinner](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/pskinner)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2022, 1:39am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/8 "2022-01-29T01:39:30Z")

</div>

You were spot-on, Todd - a proposed well. They need to receive “lease release” from the current operator (no production in over a year). Is “lease release” something I should be doing for myself going forward (when no production in a long time)?

Hypothetical question: IF the same operator was proposing a new well, would they be using the old lease (whatever those terms and % were, rather than offering a new lease)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [March 23, 2022, 6:52pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/activity-in-caddo-29-09n-11w/64310/9 "2022-03-23T18:52:12Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
