# Abundance Of Landmen (And, Landwomen) In Certain County Offices

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507
**Category:** General Mineral Rights Discussion
**Created:** [May 25, 2010, 8:49pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507 "2010-05-25T20:49:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Kenny\_Love](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/kenny_love/32/4920_2.png) [@Kenny\_Love](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Kenny_Love)
#### Post date: [May 25, 2010, 8:49pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/1 "2010-05-25T20:49:33Z")

</div>

Not one to lend to supposition, what should the sudden abundance of landmen (landwomen, also) in certain County offices on a daily basis indicate to the inexperienced layperson mineral rights owner, such as myself? 🙂

kl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chase\_Guidry](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/c67d28/32.png) [@Chase\_Guidry](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Chase_Guidry)
#### Post date: [May 26, 2010, 4:17pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/2 "2010-05-26T16:17:03Z")

</div>

It means someone is taking an interest in the area. Let’s see; Right of Way project(s) (pipeline, fiber optic, utilities, HWY, etc), Natural Resource Exploration (Coal, Oil, Natural Gas, Lignite, etc), Large real estate project…

In my opinion, it can mean a lot of things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Kenny\_Love](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/kenny_love/32/4920_2.png) [@Kenny\_Love](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Kenny_Love)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2010, 6:54pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/3 "2010-05-28T18:54:51Z")

</div>

Thanks, Mr. Preston. 🙂

kl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jules\_Clement](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/jules_clement/32/5065_2.png) [@Jules\_Clement](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Jules_Clement)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2010, 11:04pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/4 "2010-05-28T23:04:42Z")

</div>

Mr. Preston,

That may be accurate if the landmen are representing different clients. From my experience, there is little to no correlation between number of landmen and bonus amount.

The most important factor is how many different operators are being represented by those landmen.

JC, Independent Petroleum Landman

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Laura\_Reagan](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/laura_reagan/32/4629_2.png) [@Laura\_Reagan](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Laura_Reagan)
#### Post date: [April 16, 2011, 6:50am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/5 "2011-04-16T06:50:41Z")

</div>

Landmen, no such thing as a landwoman…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Buddy\_Cotten](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/buddy_cotten/32/5079_2.png) [@Buddy\_Cotten](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Buddy_Cotten)
#### Post date: [April 16, 2011, 7:13am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/6 "2011-04-16T07:13:36Z")

</div>

Laura,

You are of course correct.

I always liked the term “Land Ma’am” best. Appeared to me to be Texas chivalry at its best.

PS. Landman is an old, old, contraction of the term Land Manager, or land management. Has no reference to gender.

It could get out of hand. Landgays and landlezzies. I like the term Vault Monkey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Brandon\_Sneed](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/brandon_sneed/32/4517_2.png) [@Brandon\_Sneed](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Brandon_Sneed)
#### Post date: [April 28, 2011, 3:19am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/7 "2011-04-28T03:19:01Z")

</div>

I’m with you Buddy. Vault Monkey is indeed most appealing and fitting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/uploads/db5755/original/3X/6/c/6c7c56608c843272ad6e3662ce9562a5956f173e.png) [@system](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 4:42am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/abundance-of-landmen-and-landwomen-in-certain-county-offices/24507/8 "2018-08-15T04:42:52Z")

</div>


