# 1N 3W Section 29

**URL:** https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549
**Category:** Garvin County, OK
**Created:** [October 21, 2018, 4:00am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549 "2018-10-21T04:00:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 18
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/gil_harris/32/201_2.png) [@Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Gil_Harris)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2018, 4:00am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/1 "2018-10-21T04:00:04Z")

</div>

Have a lease with Continental. Just wondering if anyone has heard of any activity in that area. Thanks again everyone. Very informative and helpful forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2018, 8:34pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/2 "2018-10-21T20:34:56Z")

</div>

89Energy has a horizontal pending. You should have gotten three OCC mailings. If not, here they are. Make sure your address is correct in the respondents list. [OAP](http://imaging.occeweb.com/imaging/OAP.aspx)

201808070

201808069

201808068

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/gil_harris/32/201_2.png) [@Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Gil_Harris)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2018, 9:44pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/3 "2018-10-21T21:44:12Z")

</div>

> [@M\_Barnes](#):
>
> 201808069

Oh wow! Looks like I have some reading in my near future. I see that my name and address are listed correctly. I haven’t seen anything in the mail yet. Thank you so much for your help M Barnes!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/gil_harris/32/201_2.png) [@Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Gil_Harris)
#### Post date: [November 11, 2019, 11:13pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/5 "2019-11-11T23:13:09Z")

</div>

We just received a lease extension offer from Continental for 1/4 royalty, and a $500 bonus per acre. It would be the standard 3-year lease. Does the bonus seem low in light of the current activity in the area? Thanks again for sharing your knowledge and experience with all of us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Frank\_Pfisch](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Frank\_Pfisch](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Frank_Pfisch)
#### Post date: [November 12, 2019, 4:46am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/6 "2019-11-12T04:46:09Z")

</div>

In general, not specific to your area, any $ with a 1/4th royalty is good. By far the most common offer with 1/4 royalty is no cash.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [November 12, 2019, 3:50pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/7 "2019-11-12T15:50:51Z")

</div>

Gil: If it is an extension of a current lease, there is no negotiation. If it is a new lease offer, meaning the original lease has expired, you can negotiate new terms. Only thing that will drive up the price is competition and most of the players have gone broke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [November 14, 2019, 6:13pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/8 "2019-11-14T18:13:47Z")

</div>

Mr Harris - In looking at your current lease, Continental has a 15-day right of first refusal, until the current lease expires on Dec. 6. I will bet a dollar to a sack of donuts you get better offers than the most recent one from Continental after December 6.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/m_barnes/32/10942_2.png) [@M\_Barnes](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/M_Barnes)
#### Post date: [November 14, 2019, 7:44pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/9 "2019-11-14T19:44:04Z")

</div>

Stay on top of any mailings. 29-1N-3W has a pooling hearing pending. Case 201901145. It is supposed to be 11/19/19. You only have 20 calendar days in which to answer the pooling once the orders come out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [November 15, 2019, 3:28pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/10 "2019-11-15T15:28:45Z")

</div>

Cause (201901145) was protested by ECHO, Continental and Marathon. 89 Energy won’t be the operator of this unit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ryan\_Thomas](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Ryan\_Thomas](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ryan_Thomas)
#### Post date: [November 15, 2019, 8:02pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/11 "2019-11-15T20:02:13Z")

</div>

Aren’t those companies protesting 89 since 89 is the applicant? How do you know 89 won’t be the operator based on protests? Sorry, I don’t understand how the OCC decides these things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [November 15, 2019, 9:41pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/12 "2019-11-15T21:41:47Z")

</div>

89 is the applicant, yes. But they don’t control the majority of the acreage in the section and are only filing the application to “move” things forward. The others are protesting because they don’t want 89 to be the operator. No mineral owner in Section 29 should want 89 Energy to drill/operate the well. They don’t have enough experience. My opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/gil_harris/32/201_2.png) [@Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Gil_Harris)
#### Post date: [December 13, 2019, 12:47am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/13 "2019-12-13T00:47:36Z")

</div>

89 Energy just offered $1400/NMA + 1/4 royalty. We are waiting to hear from Continental (last lease) to see if they can meet or match.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [December 13, 2019, 5:03am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/14 "2019-12-13T05:03:09Z")

</div>

Mr. Harris- I’ll be calling to get my sack of donuts. LOL

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/user_avatar/www.mineralrightsforum.com/gil_harris/32/201_2.png) [@Gil\_Harris](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Gil_Harris)
#### Post date: [December 13, 2019, 6:47am UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/15 "2019-12-13T06:47:55Z")

</div>

Glazed, or old fashioned? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ryan\_Thomas](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Ryan\_Thomas](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/Ryan_Thomas)
#### Post date: [December 13, 2019, 2:05pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/16 "2019-12-13T14:05:08Z")

</div>

How can you know who controls the majority of the section?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [December 13, 2019, 4:07pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/17 "2019-12-13T16:07:10Z")

</div>

Ownership reports are the easiest way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/91b2a8/32.png) [@TODD\_M\_Baker](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/TODD_M_Baker)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2019, 11:10pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/18 "2019-12-14T23:10:02Z")

</div>

I know of offers greater than the $1400 & 1/4th with good clauses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/e0b2c6/32.png) [@MRFAdmin\_SV](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/u/MRFAdmin_SV)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2025, 6:12pm UTC](https://www.mineralrightsforum.com/t/1n-3w-section-29/35549/19 "2025-01-11T18:12:58Z")

</div>


