Fender v Farr is one. 262 SW 2nd 539 542-43 Sued over the return of $935.00 of bonus or thereabouts. In this case the warranty was struck and the court held that the covenant of seizin gave the Lessee the expectation of a conveyance, since words of conveyance were used and supported by the covenant of seizin. Important to note that the covenant of seizin is not a covenant running with the land.
Another is Barton v Parnell Morrow Company Lexis 3835 To my knowledge, this case is not published.
I have not read this case.
Mr. Hutchison,
“The big print giveth and the small print taketh away” - an old adage. Seen a lease form? It’s ALL small print and every word has been carefully crafted and has a specific legal definition, many times from court decisions that did not have a favorable outcome to the Lessee and the Lessor wins, then a new lease clause.