Mineral Rights Forum

America’s conversation place for mineral owners

Reeves County, TX - Oil & Gas Discussion


Reeves County, TX - Oil & Gas Discussion

Oil & gas discussion group for those interested in Reeves County, TX. Share your experience regarding lease bonus, royalty rates, drilling activity, and oil & gas news.

Members: 645
Latest Activity: 36 minutes ago

Discussion Forum

Section 36, block 56, township 3 S, T&P

Started by Duncan Fraiser. Last reply by Duncan Fraiser 2 hours ago. 6 Replies

Anyone have any info on Apache well name LeeM1 and Lee 401AH on this section?Thanks. DuncanContinue

Local activity

Started by Michael Smith. Last reply by Ann on Friday. 3 Replies

I just inherited some mineral rights in Reeves county. Not sure if I'm wanting to keep or sell them. I would like to know what is some recent activity going on out there. Good and/or bad.Continue

T&P Twp 7 Block 55 Leasing/Purchase Rates

Started by Tom Parker. Last reply by Joseph Boaz on Friday. 5 Replies

This is about 5 miles south of Toyah. Have been getting offers regularly to lease or purchase, but don't know what are the going rates these days? There are quite a number of wells a few miles to our…Continue

going rate for 3o inch pipelines

Started by Karla KP. Last reply by Karla KP May 16. 4 Replies

Hello. My brother and I own two tracts of land in Reeves, one that has a producing well on it with Anadarko (API 389 35222) and another smaller one in the same block that is in the same pool but…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Reeves County, TX - Oil & Gas Discussion to add comments!

Comment by Bobby Grace on February 18, 2017 at 4:52am

Thanks for the references MA. I was not aware that there was any debate about the two terms. Horizontal is what you are when you are dead - parallel to the ground.  When you're walking and talking, you are vertical.  That's how my clients view it, and how I report it.  I'm old and stubborn.

Comment by Melody a moore-jaehne on February 17, 2017 at 4:02pm
My friend has 3.1 acres in Balmorea Block F. I'm trying to run some title on his minerals to see if he can drill a water well. I'm seeing zero reservations on his Deed and the Deed before him. I don't live in that county and the online site would be costly. The acreage is close to the water and my belief is that the minerals were tied up in the RAct in the early 1900's. Can any of you help me?

Comment by Wade Caldwell on February 17, 2017 at 3:54pm
Comment by M A Smith on February 17, 2017 at 1:05pm

Bobby:  It should also be noted that "Retained Acreage" clause in the standard Relinquishment Act Lease Form used by the General Land Office of the State of Texas (used for leases of mineral classified land) follows the nomenclature you described.

Comment by M A Smith on February 17, 2017 at 12:58pm

Bobby:  Yes, there is a great deal of confusion about which is which, and there is a lot of debate about the nomenclature.  The terms themselves have no legal status.  They are just a description of the clauses.  They often appear in a lease as "retained acreage" or some variant. One must read the actual clause to see what it entails.  Yours is the older definition of how they were described.  Many recent references have the reverse of that usage.  That's the direction I took.

A website following your definition:


Websites following my definition:





Comment by Bobby Grace on February 17, 2017 at 11:18am

I believe you have the horizontal and vertical Pugh Clauses reversed.

A Horizontal Pugh Clause releases depths below (and / or above) a particular depth, while a Vertical Pugh Clause releases acreage outside a pooled unit.  Most Pugh Clauses I've seen in the last twenty years have been both Horizontal and Vertical.

Comment by M A Smith on February 17, 2017 at 10:47am

Todd:  I was referring to a "vertical" Pugh Clause.  

There are two kinds of Pugh clauses, “vertical” and “horizontal.”  The purpose of a vertical Pugh Clause is to release depths in a pooled unit below the deepest producing zone at the end of the primary term or after cessation of continuous drilling operations. A variant of the vertical Pugh Clause may also release all depths except the producing zone, even the shallower zones.  This is less typical, and lessors will push back on it.  They will, however, give you the version releasing deeper zones.

The horizontal Pugh Clause operates to release all lands not included in a pooled unit.  It releases land at the surface as to all depths.

In theory, neither of these should affect royalties.  They release acreage and zones that are not contributing to production in the pooled unit from which you receive your proportional share of royalties of production from the pooled unit acreage.  The pooling, on the other hand, would affect your royalty if some of your acreage were excluded from the unit or if someone else's happened to be included, thereby changing the shared proportions.

Comment by Clint Liles on February 16, 2017 at 10:38pm

Thanks Buzz for the info.

Clint Liles

Comment by Buzz Van Meter on February 16, 2017 at 9:53pm
Todd/Clint -- the Breithorn #2H well was drilled but not completed. I don't know if vertical or horizontal. Later -- Buzz
Comment by Clint Liles on February 16, 2017 at 8:40pm


The permitted location next door to the S/W in Section 60/Apache Corporation/Approved July 25, 2016/not sure if this well(389-35183) was ever drilled/was to check out the Sandbar(Bone Springs), Wolfcamp formation and also designated as a Wildcat well.  

Link to approved drilling permit for well 35183:


GIS Map of Reeves County Section 74/Block 13/A-1879:


Clint Liles


Members (645)


© 2017   Created by Kenny DuBose.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service