Mineral Rights Forum

America’s conversation place for mineral owners

Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion

Information

Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion

Oil & gas discussion group for those interested in Garfield County, OK. Share your experience regarding lease bonus, royalty rates, drilling activity, and oil & gas news.

Members: 108
Latest Activity: on Thursday

Discussion Forum

Garfield County OK Oil & Gas Permits

Started by Dave Thompson. Last reply by Clint Liles on Thursday. 334 Replies

Post, discuss and share information related to Garfield County Oil & Gas permits in the replies below.Thank you to Clint Liles for championing the effort to keep us all up to date.Continue

Minerals For Sale Going Rates and Current Lease Bonus Rates

Started by Sandra. Last reply by T L Shields Feb 22. 4 Replies

What kind of offers have you gotten on your producing and nonproducing minerals in Payne, Logan and Garfield Counties.  Who is buying and who is making the best offers.  Post $$ amount offered and if…Continue

Nice Well!

Started by Linda Barbour. Last reply by Martha McMorries Feb 21. 1 Reply

Was looking at some Garfield wells and ran across this nice one at Sec 27-24-5 that had initial production of 1232 BOPD and 1149MCF which seems to be way above average for the area.Hopefully there…Continue

Surface Damage Agreements

Started by John Dowers Dec 7, 2014. 0 Replies

I am in the early stage of negotiating a Surface Damage Agreement in western Garfield county.I would appreciate any input/experiences from my fellow land/mineral owners as to rates and agreements…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion to add comments!

Comment by Deborah Lynne Gerst on April 12, 2015 at 9:42pm

Unfortunately we found out several things this past week.  Very nice people were dealt with at the Corporation Commission as well as the Oklahoma Tax Commission.  Seems the transportation report on the Oklahoma Corporation Commission shows no decimals but when it is reported on the Gross production on the Tax Commission they definitely put the decimals in. ha ha

Comment by Deborah Lynne Gerst on April 9, 2015 at 8:07pm

Can someone explain when the Oklahoma Corporation Commission on oil/gas division/imaged document/ 300R report - transport report shows 2  entries on the same month for oil but different entry dates?

Comment by Deborah Lynne Gerst on March 28, 2015 at 6:47pm

It is ashame I am in the wrong part of Garfield County, ha.  Section 27 21N 3W Devon.

Comment by Linda Barbour on March 28, 2015 at 5:07pm

Nice wells!

They are still out there!

Comment by Ron McKenzie on March 28, 2015 at 8:45am

Garfield: SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Carlson Trust 2407 No. 3-15H Well; NW1/4 NE1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 (BHL) of 15-24N-07W; 285.75 barrels oil per day 1,733 cu-ft gas per day TD 11,080.

SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Carlson Trust 2407 No. 4-15H Well; NW1/4 NE1/4 NE1/4 NE1/4 (BHL) of 15-24N-07W; 381.93 barrels oil per day 1,983 cu-ft gas per day TD 11,000.

SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Lois 2407 No. 3-16H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 16-24N-07W; 296 barrels oil per day 1,190 cu-ft gas per day TD 10,787.

SandRidge Exploration & Production LLC; Winter Trust 2407 No. 3-17H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 17-24N-07W; 281 barrels oil per day 2,270 cu-ft gas per day TD 10,770.

Comment by Martha McMorries on March 1, 2015 at 8:46pm

TL, When corruption is all around I find comfort in listening to my pastor Dr. Ed Young.  http://www.lightsource.com/ministry/winning-walk-tv/

Comment by T L Shields on March 1, 2015 at 3:13pm

PS regarding the USGS assessments, as an example. They estimate millions of barrels of oil in the Cambrian rocks of NE Arkansas buried deep.  To date not one bbl. of oil has come out of that formation...

Same for much of the deep Arkoma Basin, Ouachita Basin, etc. There is a lot of shallow oil in places like SE OK, NE TX but it is thick and sells for less than half "WTI" prices. But it is claimed as well. 

Comment by T L Shields on March 1, 2015 at 3:08pm

further drive this oil up into our well bores and where it can be captured.  The O/G companies have highly intelligent geologist, like my two cousins, and they know what they are doing. 

Yep, but they don't write the press releases to the mullets...er, I mean clients and investors.  And they likely have no idea what the EUR's being touted are. As for knowing what they are doing, why is Devon in debt up to its ears when it was debt free in 2004?  Why has Forest Oil went under basically and had to merge? Marion, Buccaneer, Global, WBH...

I been der, dun dat... And the old heads who survived the 1980s look with Jaded eyes at the people making the same mistakes we did in the 1980s.  And I sat in on the 2010 USGA assessment hearing in Norman. Those are "Technically Recoverable Resources"...that means we can squeeze them out of the rocks at some cost...any cost, and $300 a bbl. oil isn't "economic".  Economically recoverable resources are much less, much more expensive to exploit and isn't going to happen at $40 a bbl.

http://www.roxnoil.com/news/index.php/78-news-and-views/97-arthur-b...

Comment by Martha McMorries on February 28, 2015 at 10:49pm

Drew, The Sylvan is a shale formation, but there's not a lot of it in some areas and it completely thins to nothing in Noble county.  The Viola is a lime formation laid down during a time when OK and KS was covered by an extensive sea.  Both formations are hydrocarbon bearing formations lying below the Miss Lime and Woodford Shale and are part of the what is called the "Stacked" play in Northern OK,  The more formations, the more production. 

Comment by Drew Thompson on February 28, 2015 at 8:50pm

Martha.. what exactly are the sylvan and the viola (re: Woodford) and what is their significance as shown in 24N, 5W?

 

Members (108)

 
 
 

© 2015   Created by Kenny DuBose.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service